Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24177992›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2013

Macrophages as potential targets for zoledronic acid outside the skeleton-evidence from in vitro and in vivo models.

T L Rogers, N Wind, R Hughes, F Nutter, H K Brown, I Vasiliadou, P D Ottewell, I Holen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Zoledronate alters natural progression of tissue-engineered vascular grafts.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Implants in Orthopedics-A General Review and Perspectives.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T L RogersDepartment of Oncology, CR-UK/YCR Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
N Wind
R Hughes
F Nutter
H K Brown
I Vasiliadou
P D Ottewell
I Holen
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple cell types of the tumour microenvironment, including macrophages, contribute to the response to cancer therapy. The anti-resorptive agent zoledronic acid (ZOL) has anti-tumour effects in vitro and in vivo, but it is not known to what extent macrophages are affected by this agent. We have therefore investigated the effects of ZOL on macrophages using a combination of in vitro and in vivo models.

methodsJ774 macrophages were treated with ZOL in vitro, alone and in combination with doxorubicin (DOX), and the levels of apoptosis and necrosis determined. Uptake of zoledronic acid was assessed by detection of unprenylated Rap1a in J774 macrophages in vitro, in peritoneal macrophages and in macrophage populations isolated from subcutaneously implanted breast cancer xenografts following ZOL treatment in vivo.

resultsExposure of J774 macrophages to 5 μM ZOL for 24 h caused a significant increase in the levels of uRap1A, and higher doses/longer exposure induced apoptotic cell death. DOX (10 nM/24 h) and ZOL (10 μM/4 h) given in sequence induced significantly increased levels of apoptotic cell death compared to single agents. Peritoneal macrophages and macrophage populations isolated from breast tumour xenografts had detectable levels of uRap1A 24 h following a single, clinically achievable dose of 100 μg/kg ZOL in vivo.

conclusionWe demonstrate that macrophages are sensitive to sequential administration of DOX and ZOL, and that both peritoneal and breast tumour associated macrophages rapidly take up ZOL in vivo. Our data support that macrophages may contribute to the anti-tumour effect of ZOL.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisBlotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCell LineCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDiphosphonatesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDoxorubicinDrug SynergismFemaleHumansImidazolesMacrophagesDiphosphonatesDoxorubicinImidazolesrap1 GTP-Binding ProteinsZoledronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID24177992
PMCPMC13007476
OpenAlexW2057923612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.