Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24177985›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2014

GPU accelerated segmentation and centerline extraction of tubular structures from medical images.

Erik Smistad, Anne C Elster, Frank Lindseth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomechanics-based graph matching for augmented CT-CBCT.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2018
    Article
  9. Automatic intraoperative estimation of blood flow direction during neurosurgical interventions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A novel platform for electromagnetic navigated ultrasound bronchoscopy (EBUS).International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016
    Article
  12. CustusX: an open-source research platform for image-guided therapy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016
    Review
  13. FAST: framework for heterogeneous medical image computing and visualization.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2015
    Article
  14. Online tracking of interventional devices for endovascular aortic repair.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik SmistadDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Sem Saelandsvei 7-9, NO 7491 , Trondheim, Norway, smistad@idi.ntnu.no.
Anne C Elster
Frank Lindseth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo create a fast and generic method with sufficient quality for extracting tubular structures such as blood vessels and airways from different modalities (CT, MR and US) and organs (brain, lungs and liver) by utilizing the computational power of graphic processing units (GPUs).

methodsA cropping algorithm is used to remove unnecessary data from the datasets on the GPU. A model-based tube detection filter combined with a new parallel centerline extraction algorithm and a parallelized region growing segmentation algorithm is used to extract the tubular structures completely on the GPU. Accuracy of the proposed GPU method and centerline algorithm is compared with the ridge traversal and skeletonization/thinning methods using synthetic vascular datasets.

resultsThe implementation is tested on several datasets from three different modalities: airways from CT, blood vessels from MR, and 3D Doppler Ultrasound. The results show that the method is able to extract airways and vessels in 3-5 s on a modern GPU and is less sensitive to noise than other centerline extraction methods.

conclusionsTubular structures such as blood vessels and airways can be extracted from various organs imaged by different modalities in a matter of seconds, even for large datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingRadiographySurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.