ArticleDer Radiologe2013
[Interventional sonography of the liver and kidneys].
Article in Der Radiologe, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast enhanced ultrasound of cystic renal lesions, from diagnosis up to treatment.Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation · 2024Review
- [Biopsies of kidney lesions: when and how?]Der Radiologe · 2018Review
- [Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and image fusion for procedures of liver interventions].Der Radiologe · 2018Review
- [Possibilities of sonographic image fusion: Current developments].Der Radiologe · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueOptimization of ultrasound guided interventional procedures of the liver and kidneys using new imaging methods. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsPunctures, biopsies, drainage, intraoperative ultrasound, fusion, embolization in correlation with ultrasound and other imaging methods. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Real-time-sonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and fusion for planning, monitoring and postinterventional control. PERFORMANCE: The use of CEUS enables better detection, characterization and execution of interventional procedures. Fusion facilitates detection. ACHIEVEMENTS: The CEUS procedure is superior for detection and characterization of smaller lesions in comparison to the B scan. Fusion enables the performance of difficult interventional procedures. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The B scan is the standard imaging method but CEUS and fusion could be helpful for smaller lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.