ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2014
Automatic signal extraction, prioritizing and filtering approaches in detecting post-marketing cardiovascular events associated with targeted cancer drugs from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal identification of a rare head and neck cancer patient cohort in the clinical data warehouse of Greater Paris Teaching Hospital.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- Repurposing ketamine to treat cocaine use disorder: integration of artificial intelligence-based prediction, expert evaluation, clinical corroboration and mechanism of action analyses.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2023Article
- Integrin β3-Mediated Cell Senescence Associates with Gut Inflammation and Intestinal Degeneration in Models of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- KG-Predict: A knowledge graph computational framework for drug repurposing.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- A knowledge graph-based disease-gene prediction system using multi-relational graph convolution networks.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
- Target Adverse Event Profiles for Predictive Safety in the Postmarket Setting.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Article
- Combining phenome-driven drug-target interaction prediction with patients' electronic health records-based clinical corroboration toward drug discovery.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Detecting and Filtering Immune-Related Adverse Events Signal Based on Text Mining and Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics Common Data Model: Framework Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Predicting potential adverse events using safety data from marketed drugs.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Does Industry-Conducted All-Case Surveillance of Newly Approved Oncology Drugs Contribute to the Revision of Package Inserts in Japan?Clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Auto-Generated Physiological Chain Data for an Ontological Framework for Pharmacology and Mechanism of Action to Determine Suspected Drugs in Cases of Dysuria.Drug safety · 2019Article
- A Drug-Side Effect Context-Sensitive Network approach for drug target prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs): extraction from FDA drug labels and comparative analysis.JAMIA open · 2019Article
- Detecting Signals of Dietary Supplement Adverse Events from the CFSAN Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS).AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019Article
- Large-scale mining disease comorbidity relationships from post-market drug adverse events surveillance data.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Target-Adverse Event Profiles to Augment Pharmacovigilance: A Pilot Study With Six New Molecular Entities.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2018Article
- Spontaneous Reporting on Adverse Events by Consumers in the United States: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2018Article
- Translating New Science Into the Drug Review Process: The US FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2018Article
- Disease comorbidity-guided drug repositioning: a case study in schizophrenia.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Drug repositioning for prostate cancer: using a data-driven approach to gain new insights.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTargeted drugs dramatically improve the treatment outcomes in cancer patients; however, these innovative drugs are often associated with unexpectedly high cardiovascular toxicity. Currently, cardiovascular safety represents both a challenging issue for drug developers, regulators, researchers, and clinicians and a concern for patients. While FDA drug labels have captured many of these events, spontaneous reporting systems are a main source for post-marketing drug safety surveillance in 'real-world' (outside of clinical trials) cancer patients. In this study, we present approaches to extracting, prioritizing, filtering, and confirming cardiovascular events associated with targeted cancer drugs from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). DATA AND
methodsThe dataset includes records of 4,285,097 patients from FAERS. We first extracted drug-cardiovascular event (drug-CV) pairs from FAERS through named entity recognition and mapping processes. We then compared six ranking algorithms in prioritizing true positive signals among extracted pairs using known drug-CV pairs derived from FDA drug labels. We also developed three filtering algorithms to further improve precision. Finally, we manually validated extracted drug-CV pairs using 21 million published MEDLINE records.
resultsWe extracted a total of 11,173 drug-CV pairs from FAERS. We showed that ranking by frequency is significantly more effective than by the five standard signal detection methods (246% improvement in precision for top-ranked pairs). The filtering algorithm we developed further improved overall precision by 91.3%. By manual curation using literature evidence, we show that about 51.9% of the 617 drug-CV pairs that appeared in both FAERS and MEDLINE sentences are true positives. In addition, 80.6% of these positive pairs have not been captured by FDA drug labeling.
conclusionsThe unique drug-CV association dataset that we created based on FAERS could facilitate our understanding and prediction of cardiotoxic events associated with targeted cancer drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.