Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24177221›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2014

Trends and challenges in United States neonatal intensive care units follow-up clinics.

K Bockli, B Andrews, M Pellerite, W Meadow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The future of follow-up: technology-enabled medical and developmental follow-up care for NICU graduates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Influences of environmental exposures on preterm lung disease.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Telemedicine, a tool for follow-up of infants discharged from the NICU? Experience from a pilot project.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PICU-Based Rehabilitation and Outcomes Assessment: A Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Physicians.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K BockliDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
B AndrewsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
M PelleriteDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
W MeadowDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA mandate exists that all level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) provide a means to assess and follow their high-risk neonates after discharge. However, no standardized guidelines exist for the follow-up services provided. To determine trends of structure and care provided in NICU follow-up clinics in both the academic and private clinical setting. STUDY

designWe sent an Internet survey to NICU follow-up clinic directors at both academically affiliated and private centers. This study received institutional review board exemption.

resultWe received 89 surveys from academic institutions and 94 from private level III follow-up programs. These responses represent 55% of academic programs and 40% of private programs in the United States. Similar to academic institutions, 18% of private NICU follow-up clinics provide primary care services to patients. In both settings, the hospital supports 60% of the funding required for clinic activities. Forty-five percent of NICU graduates seen in both private and academic follow-up clinics have public aid as their primary insurance. Eighty-five percent of NICUs in both settings have guidelines outlining requirements for referrals to the follow-up clinic. Academic programs find feeding difficulties the most difficult, whereas private programs find bronchopulmonary dysplasia and feeding difficulties equally as difficult.

conclusionThe care and struggles of NICU follow-up clinics are similar in both the academic affiliated and private settings. Similar referrals, clinical evaluation and medical care occur with varying struggles.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24177221
OpenAlexW2028396831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.