Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24176492›Full record

ArticleVaccine2013

Increased efficacy of a trivalent nicotine vaccine compared to a dose-matched monovalent vaccine when formulated with alum.

Sabina H L de Villiers, Katherine E Cornish, Andrew J Troska, Marco Pravetoni, Paul R Pentel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabina H L de VilliersCenter of Global Health and Social Responsibility, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA. Electronic address: sabina@devilliers.se.
Katherine E Cornish
Andrew J Troska
Marco Pravetoni
Paul R Pentel
Orthopaedic Research Foundation · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

IMMUNIZATION TO BLOCK THE EFFECTS OF NICOTINER01DA010714 · NIDA · MINNEAPOLIS MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN, INC. · PI PENTEL, PAUL R · 1997 to 2012
$5.7M
NIDA NIH HHS DA10714NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination against nicotine is a potential treatment for tobacco smoking. Clinical trials show effect only in high antibody responders; therefore it is necessary to increase the effectiveness of nicotine vaccines. The use of a multivalent vaccine that activates several B cell populations is a possible approach to increase antibody response. The aim of this study was to investigate whether three different nicotine immunogens could be mixed to generate independent responses resulting in additive antibody titers, and whether this would alter nicotine distribution to a greater extent than antibodies generated by a monovalent vaccine. When immunogens were administered s.c. with alum adjuvant, the trivalent vaccine generated significantly higher titers and prevented the distribution of an i.v. nicotine dose to brain to a greater extent than an equivalent dose of a monovalent vaccine. The number of rats with antibody titers >1:10,000 was significantly increased in the trivalent group compared to the monovalent group. There were no correlations between the titers generated by the different nicotine immunogens in the trivalent vaccine, supporting the hypothesis that the immunogens generated independent responses from distinct populations of B cells. In contrast, when administered i.p. in Freund's adjuvant, the trivalent nicotine vaccine was not more immunogenic than its component monovalent vaccine. Vaccine immunogenicity was suppressed if unconjugated protein was added to the monovalent vaccine formulated in Freund's adjuvant, compared to monovalent vaccine alone. These data suggest a protein-protein interaction that affects titers negatively and is apparent when the vaccines are formulated with Freund's adjuvant. In summary, a trivalent nicotine vaccine formulated with alum showed significantly higher efficacy than a dose-matched monovalent vaccine and may offer a strategy for increasing nicotine vaccine immunogenicity. This approach may be generalizable to other nicotine immunogens or vaccines for other addictive drugs.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum CompoundsAnimalsInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, SubcutaneousMaleModels, AnimalNicotineRatsSmokingVaccinationVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateNicotineVaccinesAntibodyImmunogenMultivalentNicotineTobaccoVaccine

Identifiers

PMID24176492
PMCPMC4019346
OpenAlexW2070683557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.