ArticleResearch in developmental disabilities2014
Instability of delay classification and determination of early intervention eligibility in the first two years of life.
Article in Research in developmental disabilities, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between neonatal brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcomes following very preterm birth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Automated contactless radar-derived movement index for outpatient motor surveillance.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Prediction of motor developmental outcomes based on MRI radiomics in premature infants.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- New Approaches in Motor Intervention for Infants Aged 0-2 Years with or at High Risk of Unilateral or Bilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Developmental Trajectories of Very Preterm Infants and Implications for Routine Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Article
- Information Available to Parents Seeking Education about Infant Play, Milestones, and Development from Popular Sources.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Intra-Individual Variability in Gross Motor Development in Healthy Full-Term Infants Aged 0-13 Months and Associated Factors during Child Rearing.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Early exploration of one's own body, exploration of objects, and motor, language, and cognitive development relate dynamically across the first two years of life.Developmental psychology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the InterRAI Early Years for Degree of Preterm Birth and Gross Motor Delay.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Maternal Folic Acid-Containing Supplement Use in Relation to Offspring Motor Function. A Prospective Study of 503 Mother-Child Dyads.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Article
- A Prediction Model for Detecting Developmental Disabilities in Preschool-Age Children Through Digital Biomarker-Driven Deep Learning in Serious Games: Development Study.JMIR serious games · 2021Article
- Developmental Dimensions in Preterm Infants During the 1st Year of Life: The Influence of Severity of Prematurity and Maternal Generalized Anxiety.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Effects of the portage early education program on Chinese children with global developmental delay.Medicine · 2018Observational
- The Relationship of Maternal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Pregnancy Weight Gain to Neurocognitive Function at Age 10 Years among Children Born Extremely Preterm.The Journal of pediatrics · 2017Article
- Neurodevelopmental Characterization of Young Children Diagnosed with Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C1.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III) to track development and classify delays in low- and high-risk infants across the first two years of life. We assessed cognitive, language, and motor development in 24 low-risk full-term and 30 high-risk preterm infants via seven assessments performed between 3 and 24 months corrected age. The Bayley-III resulted in highly unstable delay classifications, low sensitivities, and poor positive predictive values across time. The results highlight that early intervention professionals, researchers, and policy makers should: (1) emphasize clinical opinion and prevalence of risk factors rather than standardized assessment findings when classifying delays and determining eligibility for services, and (2) develop more effective developmental assessments for infants and young children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.