Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24176188›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Rationale and study design of ViPS - variable pressure support for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled open trial.

Thomas Kiss, Andreas Güldner, Thomas Bluth, Christopher Uhlig, Peter Markus Spieth, Klaus Markstaller, Roman Ullrich, Samir Jaber, Jose Alberto Santos, Jordi Mancebo and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01769053 (International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Open Trial on Variable vs. Non-Variable Pressure Support for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01769053 naterminatednot on this map

International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Open Trial on Variable vs. Non-Variable Pressure Support for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnische Universität DresdenRan2013 to 2018Enrolled130ConditionsAcute Lung Injury, Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome, at Least 24 h of Controlled Mechanical VentilationArmsVariable Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparative assessment of hemodynamic changes and outcomes in ventilator weaning.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Variable ventilation from bench to bedside.Critical care (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  6. Approaches to ventilation in intensive care.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Variable mechanical ventilation.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Thomas Kiss
Andreas Güldner
Thomas Bluth
Christopher Uhlig
Peter Markus Spieth
Klaus Markstaller
Roman Ullrich
Samir Jaber
Jose Alberto Santos
Jordi Mancebo
Luigi Camporota
Richard Beale
Guilherme Schettino
Felipe Saddy
Immaculada Vallverdú
Bärbel Wiedemann
Thea Koch
Marcus Josephus Schultz
Paolo Pelosi
Marcelo Gama de AbreuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. mgabreu@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn pressure support ventilation (PSV), a non-variable level of pressure support is delivered by the ventilator when triggered by the patient. In contrast, variable PSV delivers a level of pressure support that varies in a random fashion, introducing more physiological variability to the respiratory pattern. Experimental studies show that variable PSV improves gas exchange, reduces lung inflammation and the mean pressure support, compared to non-variable PSV. Thus, it can theoretically shorten weaning from the mechanical ventilator. METHODS/

designThe ViPS (variable pressure support) trial is an international investigator-initiated multicenter randomized controlled open trial comparing variable vs. non-variable PSV. Adult patients on controlled mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours who are ready to be weaned are eligible for the study. The randomization sequence is blocked per center and performed using a web-based platform. Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two groups: variable PSV or non-variable PSV. In non-variable PSV, breath-by-breath pressure support is kept constant and targeted to achieve a tidal volume of 6 to 8 ml/kg. In variable PSV, the mean pressure support level over a specific time period is targeted at the same mean tidal volume as non-variable PSV, but individual levels vary randomly breath-by-breath. The primary endpoint of the trial is the time to successful weaning, defined as the time from randomization to successful extubation. DISCUSSION: ViPS is the first randomized controlled trial investigating whether variable, compared to non-variable PSV, shortens the duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation in a mixed population of critically ill patients. This trial aims to determine the role of variable PSV in the intensive care unit.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT01769053.

Indexed as

Research DesignRespiration, ArtificialClinical ProtocolsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLungPressureRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID24176188
PMCPMC3827000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.