Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24176112›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2013

Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer.

Anneleen Daemen, Obi L Griffith, Laura M Heiser, Nicholas J Wang, Oana M Enache, Zachary Sanborn, Francois Pepin, Steffen Durinck, James E Korkola, Malachi Griffith and 17 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 178 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 315 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Anneleen Daemen
Obi L Griffith
Laura M Heiser
Nicholas J Wang
Oana M Enache
Zachary Sanborn
Francois Pepin
Steffen Durinck
James E Korkola
Malachi Griffith
Joe S Hur
Nam Huh
Jongsuk Chung
Leslie Cope
Mary Jo Fackler
Christopher Umbricht
Saraswati Sukumar
Pankaj Seth
Vikas P Sukhatme
Lakshmi R Jakkula
Yiling Lu
Gordon B Mills
Raymond J Cho
Eric A Collisson
Laura J van't Veer
Paul T Spellman
Joe W Gray
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USOregon Health & Science University · USSamsung (South Korea) · KRUniversity of California, San Francisco · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USDovetail Genomics (United States) · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tissue and Outcomes CoreP50CA058207 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 1992 to 2012
$32.7M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Systems-Based Predictions of Responses to Cancer TherapyU54CA112970 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI SPELLMAN, PAUL T. · 2004 to 2014
$27.1M
The Berkeley Cancer Genome CenterU24CA126551 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 2006 to 2009
$5.4M
A Model for Preclinical Biomarker Discovery in Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaK08CA137153 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLISSON, ERIC · 2010 to 2014
$815k
CIHRNCI NIH HHS 5K08CA137153-02NCI NIH HHS CA 126551NCI NIH HHS P50 CA 58207NCI NIH HHS U54 CA 112970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst-generation molecular profiles for human breast cancers have enabled the identification of features that can predict therapeutic response; however, little is known about how the various data types can best be combined to yield optimal predictors. Collections of breast cancer cell lines mirror many aspects of breast cancer molecular pathobiology, and measurements of their omic and biological therapeutic responses are well-suited for development of strategies to identify the most predictive molecular feature sets.

resultsWe used least squares-support vector machines and random forest algorithms to identify molecular features associated with responses of a collection of 70 breast cancer cell lines to 90 experimental or approved therapeutic agents. The datasets analyzed included measurements of copy number aberrations, mutations, gene and isoform expression, promoter methylation and protein expression. Transcriptional subtype contributed strongly to response predictors for 25% of compounds, and adding other molecular data types improved prediction for 65%. No single molecular dataset consistently out-performed the others, suggesting that therapeutic response is mediated at multiple levels in the genome. Response predictors were developed and applied to TCGA data, and were found to be present in subsets of those patient samples.

conclusionsThese results suggest that matching patients to treatments based on transcriptional subtype will improve response rates, and inclusion of additional features from other profiling data types may provide additional benefit. Further, we suggest a systems biology strategy for guiding clinical trials so that patient cohorts most likely to respond to new therapies may be more efficiently identified.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, BiologicalProteomicsAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRNA SplicingSignal TransductionAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24176112
PMCPMC3937590
OpenAlexW2140593657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.