Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24175936›Full record

ReviewBMC psychiatry2013

Is deep brain stimulation a treatment option for anorexia nervosa?

Marloes S Oudijn, Jitschak G Storosum, Elise Nelis, Damiaan Denys

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03168893 (Deep Brain Stimulation on the Subgenual Cingulate and Accumbens Nucleus for Patients With Chronic, Severe and Resistant Anorexia Nervosa), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03168893 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Deep Brain Stimulation on the Subgenual Cingulate and Accumbens Nucleus for Patients With Chronic, Severe and Resistant Anorexia Nervosa

TypeinterventionalSponsorParc de Salut MarRan2017 to 2020Enrolled8ConditionsAnorexia NervosaArmsDeep brain stimulation ON, Deep brain stimulation OFF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Emerging Treatments in Eating Disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marloes S Oudijn
Jitschak G Storosum
Elise Nelis
Damiaan DenysDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, 1105, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ddenys@gmail.com.
University of Amsterdam · NLRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder with high rates of morbidity, comorbidity and mortality, which in a subset of patients (21%) takes on a chronic course. Since an evidence based treatment for AN is scarce, it is crucial to investigate new treatment options, preferably focused on influencing the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of AN. The objective of the present paper was to review the evidence for possible neurobiological correlates of AN, and to hypothesize about potential targets for Deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment for chronic, therapy-refractory AN. One avenue for exploring new treatment options based on the neurobiological correlates of AN, is the search for symptomatologic and neurobiologic parallels between AN and other compulsivity- or reward-related disorders. As in other compulsive disorders, the fronto-striatal circuitry, in particular the insula, the ventral striatum (VS) and the prefrontal, orbitofrontal, temporal, parietal and anterior cingulate cortices, are likely to be implicated in the neuropathogenesis of AN. In this paper we will review the few available cases in which DBS has been performed in patients with AN (either as primary diagnosis or as comorbid condition). Given the overlap in symptomatology and neurocircuitry between reward-related disorders such as obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and AN, and the established efficacy of accumbal DBS in OCD, we hypothesize that DBS of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and other areas associated with reward, e.g. the anterior cingulated cortex (ACC), might be an effective treatment for patients with chronic, treatment refractory AN, providing not only weight restoration, but also significant and sustained improvement in AN core symptoms and associated comorbidities and complications. Possible targets for DBS in AN are the ACC, the ventral anterior limb of the capsula interna (vALIC) and the VS. We suggest conducting larger efficacy studies that also explore the functional effects of DBS in AN.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationAnorexia NervosaCerebral CortexHumansInternal CapsuleTreatment OutcomeVentral Striatum

Identifiers

PMID24175936
PMCPMC4229382
OpenAlexW2079027549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.