ReviewJRSM cardiovascular disease2012
Platt versus Pickering: what molecular insight to primary hyperaldosteronism tells us about hypertension.
Review in JRSM cardiovascular disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing the power of genomics in hypertension: tip of the iceberg?Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2025Review
- Scrutinizing neurodegenerative diseases: decoding the complex genetic architectures through a multi-omics lens.Human genomics · 2024Review
- Identification of the Molecular Components of Enhancer-Mediated Gene Expression Variation in Multiple Tissues Regulating Blood Pressure.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2024Article
- Genomics of Blood Pressure and Hypertension: Extending the Mosaic Theory Toward Stratification.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent genome-wide analyses have found 50 loci associated with variation in blood pressure but failed to advance understanding of the molecular basis of hypertension. Whether hypertension is not after all due to multiple common variants or is simply an order of magnitude more complex than previously suspected remains unsettled - in part because only a minority of subjects in the analyses had true hypertension. A better starting point than normotensive subjects for explaining hypertension may be the most common distinct cause of hypertension, primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA). The findings that 40% of patients with an aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) of the adrenal have somatic gain-of-function mutations in a single gene, KCNJ5, and that this gene is, less frequently, mutated in inherited cases of PHA, potentially transform the understanding and management of hypertension. Firstly, they illustrate how hypertension could be due to a multiplicity of uncommon variants. Mutations that present with abnormal electrolytes and anatomy are the easiest to detect but are likely the tip of the iceberg. Secondly, we found a genotype:phenotype pattern, with KCNJ5 mutations inducing larger APAs in the cortisol-secreting zona fasciculata in young women. Smaller APAs without KCNJ5 mutations usually present in older men with resistant hypertension, having been overlooked earlier because of their size. This reflects their compact zona glomerulosa cells. Routine measurement of plasma renin in hypertension and a new positron emission tomography/computerized tomography allow prompt diagnosis and management of PHA before resistant hypertension ensues. Wider recognition of distinct phenotypes should permit earlier, specific treatment and reduce life-time risk of complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.