ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2013
Biobanking in a constantly developing medical world.
Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision medicine in low-income settings and small island developing states.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Advancing Wildlife Conservation Through Biobanking in South America.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Article
- Commodification of biomaterials and data when funding is contingent to transfer in biobank research.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021Review
- How Semantics Connotations May Influence Concerns About Donation of Biospecimens.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2021Article
- Harmonization of Biobank Education for Biobank Technicians: Identification of Learning Objectives.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2021Article
- Building a Population Representative Pediatric Biobank: Lessons Learned From the Greater Cincinnati Childhood Cohort.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- NANOmetric BIO-Banked MSC-Derived Exosome (NANOBIOME) as a Novel Approach to Regenerative Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Review
- Aspects of Modern Biobank Activity - Comprehensive Review.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2018Review
- Partnering with patients in translational oncology research: ethical approach.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Taking Bioinformatics to Systems Medicine.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016Review
- Biobanking of Exosomes in the Era of Precision Medicine: Are We There Yet?International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Allogenic banking of dental pulp stem cells for innovative therapeutics.World journal of stem cells · 2015Review
- Biobanks in the era of personalized medicine: objectives, challenges, and innovation: Overview.The EPMA journal · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biobank is a very sophisticated system that consists of a programmed storage of biological material and corresponding data. Biobanks are created to be used in medical research, in clinical and translational medicine, and in healthcare. In the past 20 years, a large number of biobanks have been set up around the world, to support the modern research directions in medicine such as omix and personalized medicine. More recently, embryonic and adult stem cell banks have been developed. Stem cell banking was reported to be required for medical research as well as clinical transplant applications. The quality of the samples stored in a biobank is very important. The standardization is also important; the biological material stored in a biobank must be processed in a manner that allows compatibility with other biobanks that preserve samples in the same field. In this paper, we review some issues related to biobanks purposes, quality, harmonization, and their financial and ethical aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.