Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24174652›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Nucleus accumbens responses differentiate execution and restraint in reward-directed behavior.

Jamie D Roitman, Amy L Loriaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Distinct Action Signals by Subregions in the Nucleus Accumbens during STOP-Change Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Linking neuroscience with modern concepts of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2015
    Review
  10. Action versus valence in decision making.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamie D RoitmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Amy L Loriaux

Funding

Cortico-striatal signaling in risk preferenceR21DA027127 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ROITMAN, JAMIE D. · 2010 to 2011
$385k
NIDA NIH HHS DA-027127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our behavior is powerfully driven by environmental cues that signal the availability of rewarding stimuli. We frequently encounter stimuli-a bowl of candy or an alert from our smartphone-that trigger actions to obtain those rewards, even though there may be positive outcomes associated with not acting. The inability to restrain one's action in the presence of reward-associated cues is one type of impulsive behavior and a component of such maladaptive behaviors as overeating, gambling, and substance abuse. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is ideally situated to integrate multiple cognitive and affective inputs to bias action via outputs through the basal ganglia. NAc neurons have been shown to respond to cues that predict reward availability, goal-directed behaviors aimed at obtaining them, and delivery of the reward itself. As these processes are typically associated, it is difficult to discern whether signals in the NAc are more closely related to processing reward-predictive aspects of goal-directed behavior or selection of behavioral response. To dissociate these possibilities, we recorded the activity of NAc neurons while rats performed a task in which two different cues both informed rats of reward availability but required them to either press a lever (Go) or withhold pressing (NoGo) to obtain the reward. Individual cue-responsive neurons showed either increases or decreases in activity at cue onset. Increases in activity were larger, and decreases smaller, when rats withheld lever pressing, whether correctly for NoGo trials or in error on Go trials. Thus NAc cue responses correlated with action, regardless of cue type or accuracy.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsRewardAnimalsCuesGoalsMaleNeuronsNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyexecutive controlnucleus accumbensrewardrodent

Identifiers

PMID24174652
PMCPMC3921383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.