ReviewILAR journal2013
Improving genome assemblies and annotations for nonhuman primates.
Review in ILAR journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Novel Insights into the Landscape of Crossover and Noncrossover Events in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Revised eutherian gene collections.BMC genomic data · 2022Article
- MicroRNA Signatures of the Developing Primate Fovea.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Understanding the causes of errors in eukaryotic protein-coding gene prediction: a case study of primate proteomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- The evolution of S100A7 in primates: a model of concerted and birth-and-death evolution.Immunogenetics · 2019Article
- Comparative genome-wide survey of single nucleotide variation uncovers the genetic diversity and potential biomedical applications among six Macaca species.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Modeling autism in non-human primates: Opportunities and challenges.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2018Review
- SNP-based genetic characterization of the Tulane National Primate Research Center's conventional and specific pathogen-free rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) populations.Journal of medical primatology · 2018Article
- Article
- Exome screening to identify loss-of-function mutations in the rhesus macaque for development of preclinical models of human disease.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Transcriptome Analysis in Domesticated Species: Challenges and Strategies.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2015Review
- A new rhesus macaque assembly and annotation for next-generation sequencing analyses.Biology direct · 2014Article
- FixPred: a resource for correction of erroneous protein sequences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- Progress in genetics and genomics of nonhuman primates. Introduction.ILAR journal · 2013Article
- The devil is in the details: Transposable element analysis of the Tasmanian devil genome.Mobile genetic elementsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The study of nonhuman primates (NHP) is key to understanding human evolution, in addition to being an important model for biomedical research. NHPs are especially important for translational medicine. There are now exciting opportunities to greatly increase the utility of these models by incorporating Next Generation (NextGen) sequencing into study design. Unfortunately, the draft status of nonhuman genomes greatly constrains what can currently be accomplished with available technology. Although all genomes contain errors, draft assemblies and annotations contain so many mistakes that they make currently available nonhuman primate genomes misleading to investigators conducting evolutionary studies; and these genomes are of insufficient quality to serve as references for NextGen studies. Fortunately, NextGen sequencing can be used in the production of greatly improved genomes. Existing Sanger sequences can be supplemented with NextGen whole genome, and exomic genomic sequences to create new, more complete and correct assemblies. Additional physical mapping, and an incorporation of information about gene structure, can be used to improve assignment of scaffolds to chromosomes. In addition, mRNA-sequence data can be used to economically acquire transcriptome information, which can be used for annotation. Some highly polymorphic and complex regions, for example MHC class I and immunoglobulin loci, will require extra effort to properly assemble and annotate. However, for the vast majority of genes, a modest investment in money, and a somewhat greater investment in time, can greatly improve assemblies and annotations sufficient to produce true, reference grade nonhuman primate genomes. Such resources can reasonably be expected to transform nonhuman primate research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.