Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24174404›Full record

SynthesisObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2014

Neural bases of food perception: coordinate-based meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies in multiple modalities.

Claudia I Huerta, Pooja R Sarkar, Timothy Q Duong, Angela R Laird, Peter T Fox

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The development and testing of the TTU food cue reactivity image bank.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia I HuertaDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA; Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Pooja R Sarkar
Timothy Q Duong
Angela R Laird
Peter T Fox

Funding

Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthKL2TR001118 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, DOUGHERTY, DONALD M · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Development of a Cognitive Paradigm Ontology: BrainMap and BIRN IntergrationR01MH084812 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON, TURNER, JESS · 2009 to 2011
$869k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001118NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the results of the three food-cue paradigms most commonly used for functional neuroimaging studies to determine: i) commonalities and differences in the neural response patterns by paradigm and ii) the relative robustness and reliability of responses to each paradigm.

methodsFunctional magnetic resonance imaging studies using standardized stereotactic coordinates to report brain responses to food cues were identified using online databases. Studies were grouped by food-cue modality as: i) tastes (8 studies); ii) odors (8 studies); and, iii) images (11 studies). Activation likelihood estimation was used to identify statistically reliable regional responses within each stimulation paradigm.

resultsBrain response distributions were distinctly different for the three stimulation modalities, corresponding to known differences in location of the respective primary and associative cortices. Visual stimulation induced the most robust and extensive responses. The left anterior insula was the only brain region reliably responding to all three stimulus categories.

conclusionsThese findings suggest visual food-cue paradigm as promising candidate for imaging studies addressing the neural substrate of therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingPhotic StimulationBrainCuesFoodHumansLikelihood FunctionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronsOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionReproducibility of ResultsTaste

Identifiers

PMID24174404
PMCPMC4007379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.