ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2013
Modeling of pharmacokinetic systems using stochastic deconvolution.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs) in NONMEM for Probing Population Pharmacokinetic Model Misspecification: Diagnostic Utility, Practical Considerations, and Future Directions.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Toward Establishing an In Vitro-In Vivo Link-a Workshop Summary Report.The AAPS journal · 2019Article
- Evaluating In Vivo-In Vitro Correlation Using a Bayesian Approach.The AAPS journal · 2016Article
- Stochastic nonlinear mixed effects: a metformin case study.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In environments where complete mechanistic knowledge of the system dynamics is not available, a synergy of first-principle concepts, stochastic methods and statistical approaches can provide an efficient, accurate, and insightful strategy for model development. In this work, a system of ordinary differential equations describing system pharmacokinetics (PK) was coupled to a Wiener process for tracking the absorption rate coefficient, and was embedded in a nonlinear mixed effects population PK formalism. The procedure is referred to as "stochastic deconvolution" and it is proposed as a diagnostic tool to inform on a mapping function between the fraction of the drug absorbed and the fraction of the drug dissolved when applying one-stage methods to in vitro-in vivo correlation modeling. The goal of this work was to show that stochastic deconvolution can infer an a priori specified absorption profile given dense observational (simulated) data. The results demonstrate that the mathematical model is able to accurately reproduce the simulated data in scenarios where solution strategies for linear, time-invariant systems would assuredly fail. To this end, PK systems that are representative of Michaelis-Menten kinetics and enterohepatic circulation were investigated. Furthermore, the solution times are manageable using a modest computer hardware platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24174399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.