Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24173883›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2014

Association of vitamin D status and blood pressure response after renal denervation.

Janine Pöss, Felix Mahfoud, Christian Ukena, Murray David Esler, Markus Schlaich, Dagmara Hering, Bodo Cremers, Ulrich Laufs, Michael Böhm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neuropeptide Y as an indicator of successful alterations in sympathetic nervous activity after renal sympathetic denervation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Trial
  3. Overcoming variable response in renal denervation: Key strategies for reliable clinical implementation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Second denervation in a patient with resistant hypertension.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Retinal microperfusion after renal denervation in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Single-sided renal denervation may be not suitable for patients with significant renal artery stenosis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Janine PössKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany, Janine.poess@uks.eu.
Felix Mahfoud
Christian Ukena
Murray David Esler
Markus Schlaich
Dagmara Hering
Bodo Cremers
Ulrich Laufs
Michael Böhm
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUGdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D deficiency is associated with hypertension; however, it is unclear whether vitamin D influences therapeutic blood pressure reduction. Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure in resistant hypertension. We hypothesized that vitamin D might influence blood pressure response to RDN.

methodsVitamin D was measured in 101 patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN. The associations between vitamin D status and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction 6 months after RDN were analyzed.

resultsMean office SBP at baseline was 171.5 ± 2 mmHg. After RDN, mean office SBP was reduced by 28.4 ± 2.3 mmHg (p = 0.007). 85 patients (84.2 %) had SBP reductions >10 mmHg (responders). Vitamin D concentrations were lower in non-responders as compared to responders (9.9 ± 4.5 vs. 13.7 ± 7.4 ng/ml, p = 0.008). Non-responders (n = 16, 15.8 %), more often had a vitamin D concentration below the median as compared to responders (81 vs. 46 %, p = 0.013). The percentage of patients with normal vitamin D concentrations increased with increasing tertiles of SBP reduction (p for trend = 0.020). In patients with vitamin D concentrations below the median, SBP reduction was lower as compared to patients with a vitamin D concentration above the median (23.5 ± 3.2 vs. 33.7 ± 3.2 mmHg, p = 0.026). Baseline vitamin D concentrations correlated with SBP reduction (r = 0.202, p = 0.043).

conclusionsIn patients with resistant hypertension, low vitamin D concentrations were associated with a decreased SBP response and a higher rate of non-response.

Indexed as

Autonomic DenervationBlood PressureAntihypertensive AgentsBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansHypertensionKidneyMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVitamin DVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DAntihypertensive AgentsBiomarkersVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID24173883
OpenAlexW2041760102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.