Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24172098›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2013

The impact of perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion on survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Lindsay L Morgenstern Warner, Sean C Dowdy, Janice R Martin, Maureen A Lemens, Michaela E McGree, Amy L Weaver, Karl C Podratz, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Preoperative Transfusion for Anemia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery for Malignancy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Blood transfusion practices in cancer surgery.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay L Morgenstern Warner*Mayo Medical School, †Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, ‡Department of Surgical Clinical Research, and §Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sean C Dowdy
Janice R Martin
Maureen A Lemens
Michaela E McGree
Amy L Weaver
Karl C Podratz
Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Keith L. Knutson · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePerioperative packed red blood cell transfusion (PRBCT) has been implicated as a negative prognostic marker in surgical oncology. There is a paucity of evidence on the impact of PRBCT on outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We assessed whether PRBCT is an independent risk factor of recurrence and death from EOC.

methodsPerioperative patient characteristics and process-of-care variables (defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) were retrospectively abstracted from 587 women who underwent primary EOC staging between January 2, 2003, and December 29, 2008. Associations with receipt of PRBCT were evaluated using univariate logistic regression models. The associations between receipt of PRBCT and disease-free survival and overall survival were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and using propensity score matching and stratification, respectively.

resultsThe rate of PRBCT was 77.0%. The mean ± SD units transfused was 4.1 ± 3.1 U. In the univariate analysis, receipt of PRBCT was significantly associated with older age, advanced stage (≥ IIIA), undergoing splenectomy, higher surgical complexity, serous histologic diagnosis, greater estimated blood loss, longer operating time, the presence of residual disease, and lower preoperative albumin and hemoglobin. Perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion was not associated with an increased risk for recurrence or death, in an analysis adjusting for other risk factors in a multivariable model or in an analysis using propensity score matching or stratification to control for differences between the patients with and without PRBCT.

conclusionsPerioperative packed red blood cell transfusion does not seem to be directly associated with recurrence and death in EOC. However, lower preoperative hemoglobin was associated with a higher risk for recurrence. The need for PRBCT seems to be a stronger prognostic indicator than the receipt of PRBCT.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Loss, SurgicalCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPerioperative PeriodPrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24172098
PMCPMC4306564
OpenAlexW1980085797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.