Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24172050›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2014

Understanding the X chromosome inactivation cycle in mice: a comprehensive view provided by nuclear transfer.

Mami Oikawa, Kimiko Inoue, Hirosuke Shiura, Shogo Matoba, Satoshi Kamimura, Michiko Hirose, Kazuyuki Mekada, Atsushi Yoshiki, Satoshi Tanaka, Kuniya Abe and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genomic imprinting ofGenes & development · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Xist imprinting is promoted by the hemizygous (unpaired) state in the male germ line.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Imprinted X chromosome inactivation offers up a double dose of epigenetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mami OikawaRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan; Medical Research Institute; Tokyo Medical and Dental University; Tokyo, Japan.
Kimiko InoueRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan; Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science; University of Tsukuba; Tsukuba, Japan.
Hirosuke ShiuraRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan.
Shogo MatobaRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan.
Satoshi KamimuraRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan; Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science; University of Tsukuba; Tsukuba, Japan.
Michiko HiroseRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan.
Kazuyuki MekadaRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan.
Atsushi YoshikiRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan.
Satoshi TanakaDepartment of Animal Resource Sciences/Veterinary Medical Sciences; University of Tokyo; Tokyo, Japan.
Kuniya AbeRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan; Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science; University of Tsukuba; Tsukuba, Japan.
Fumitoshi IshinoMedical Research Institute; Tokyo Medical and Dental University; Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuo OguraRIKEN BioResource Center; Tsukuba, Japan; Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science; University of Tsukuba; Tsukuba, Japan; Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine; University of Tokyo; Tokyo, Japan.
RIKEN BioResource Research Center · JPLife University · USMedical Research Institute · LKThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During mouse development, imprinted X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is observed in preimplantation embryos and is inherited to the placental lineage, whereas random XCI is initiated in the embryonic proper. Xist RNA, which triggers XCI, is expressed ectopically in cloned embryos produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). To understand these mechanisms, we undertook a large-scale nuclear transfer study using different donor cells throughout the life cycle. The Xist expression patterns in the reconstructed embryos suggested that the nature of imprinted XCI is the maternal Xist-repressing imprint established at the last stage of oogenesis. Contrary to the prevailing model, this maternal imprint is erased in both the embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. The lack of the Xist-repressing imprint in the postimplantation somatic cells clearly explains how the SCNT embryos undergo ectopic Xist expression. Our data provide a comprehensive view of the XCI cycle in mice, which is essential information for future investigations of XCI mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGenomic ImprintingMaleMiceNuclear Transfer TechniquesRNA, Long NoncodingX Chromosome InactivationRNA, Long NoncodingXIST non-coding RNAembryomousenuclear transferX chromosome inactivation

Identifiers

PMID24172050
PMCPMC3962530
OpenAlexW2014071735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.