Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24171835›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2013

Complex small supernumerary marker chromosomes - an update.

Thomas Liehr, Sanja Cirkovic, Tanja Lalic, Marija Guc-Scekic, Cynthia de Almeida, Jörg Weimer, Ivan Iourov, Maria Isabel Melaragno, Roberta S Guilherme, Eunice-Georgia G Stefanou and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prenatal Diagnosis of Mosaic Tetrasomy 18p in a Case without Sonographic Abnormalities.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Thomas LiehrJena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, Jena D-07743, Germany ; Institut für Humangenetik, Postfach, Jena D-07740, Germany.
Sanja CirkovicLaboratory for Medical Genetics, Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia "Dr Vukan Cupic", Radoje Dakic str. 6-8, Belgrade 11070, Serbia.
Tanja LalicLaboratory for Medical Genetics, Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia "Dr Vukan Cupic", Radoje Dakic str. 6-8, Belgrade 11070, Serbia.
Marija Guc-ScekicLaboratory for Medical Genetics, Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia "Dr Vukan Cupic", Radoje Dakic str. 6-8, Belgrade 11070, Serbia ; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Belgrade, Serbia.
Cynthia de AlmeidaMilitary Hospital associated with "Universidad de la República (UDELAR)", Montevideo, Uruguay.
Jörg WeimerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UKSH Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3; House 24, Kiel 24105, Germany.
Ivan IourovResearch Center for Mental Health, RAMS, Moscow, Russia ; Institute of Pediatrics and Children Surgery, RF Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.
Maria Isabel MelaragnoDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu 740, São Paulo SP, 04023-900, Brazil.
Roberta S GuilhermeDepartment of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu 740, São Paulo SP, 04023-900, Brazil.
Eunice-Georgia G StefanouDepartment of Pediatrics, Laboratory of Medical Genetics, University General Hospital of Patras, Rion, Patras 26504, Greece.
Dilek AktasHacettepe University School of Medicine, Dept of Medical Genetics, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Katharina KreskowskiJena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, Jena D-07743, Germany.
Elisabeth KleinJena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, Jena D-07743, Germany.
Monika ZieglerJena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, Jena D-07743, Germany.
Nadezda KosyakovaJena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, Jena D-07743, Germany.
Marianne VollethInstitut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Ahmed B HamidJena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, Jena D-07743, Germany.
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEInstitute of Public Health of Serbia · RSJena University Hospital · DEUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRClinical Research Center Kiel · DEGeneral University Hospital of Patras · GRHacettepe University · TRMental Health Research Center of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUUniversidad de la República · UYUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) constitute one of the smallest subgroups of sSMC in general. Complex sSMC consist of chromosomal material derived from more than one chromosome; the best known representative of this group is the derivative chromosome 22 {der(22)t(11;22)} or Emanuel syndrome. In 2008 we speculated that complex sSMC could be part of an underestimated entity.

resultsHere, the overall yet reported 412 complex sSMC are summarized. They constitute 8.4% of all yet in detail characterized sSMC cases. The majority of the complex sSMC is contributed by patients suffering from Emanuel syndrome (82%). Besides there are a der(22)t(8;22)(q24.1;q11.1) and a der(13)t(13;18)(q11;p11.21) or der(21)t(18;21)(p11.21;q11.1) = der(13 or 21)t(13 or 21;18) syndrome. The latter two represent another 2.6% and 2.2% of the complex sSMC-cases, respectively. The large majority of complex sSMC has a centric minute shape and derives from an acrocentric chromosome. Nonetheless, complex sSMC can involve material from each chromosomal origin. Most complex sSMC are inherited form a balanced translocation in one parent and are non-mosaic. Interestingly, there are hot spots for the chromosomal breakpoints involved.

conclusionsComplex sSMC need to be considered in diagnostics, especially in non-mosaic, centric minute shaped sSMC. As yet three complex-sSMC-associated syndromes are identified. As recurrent breakpoints in the complex sSMC were characterized, it is to be expected that more syndromes are identified in this subgroup of sSMC. Overall, complex sSMC emphasize once more the importance of detailed cytogenetic analyses, especially in patients with idiopathic mental retardation.

Indexed as

Complex small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC)Emanuel syndromeGenotype-phenotype correlationMosaicismSSMC shape

Identifiers

PMID24171835
PMCPMC4129180
OpenAlexW2149962831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.