Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24171825›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2013

Molecular subtypes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and their relation to prognosis: a population-based cohort study.

Wenjing Zhou, Karin Jirström, Rose-Marie Amini, Marie-Louise Fjällskog, Thomas Sollie, Henrik Lindman, Therese Sørlie, Carl Blomqvist, Fredrik Wärnberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Construction of a risk model based on NJournal of biosciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. HER2-Overexpressing Ductal CarcinomaCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: immune cell composition according to subtype.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: an update for the pathologist in the era of individualized risk assessment and tailored therapies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microinvasive Carcinoma versus Ductal CarcinomaJournal of breast cancer · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenjing ZhouDepartment of Surgical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-75105, Sweden. wenjing.zh@gmail.com.
Karin Jirström
Rose-Marie Amini
Marie-Louise Fjällskog
Thomas Sollie
Henrik Lindman
Therese Sørlie
Carl Blomqvist
Fredrik Wärnberg
Uppsala University · SEHelsinki University Hospital · FILund University · SEÖrebro University · SEOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent molecular subtypes of breast cancer have been identified based on gene expression profiling. Treatment suggestions based on an approximation of these subtypes by immunohistochemical criteria have been published by the St Gallen international expert consensus panel. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can be classified into the same molecular subtypes. Our aim was to study the relation between these newly defined subtypes and prognosis in DCIS.

methodsTMA including 458 women from a population-based cohort with DCIS diagnosed 1986-2004 was used. Stainings for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 were used to classify the surrogate molecular subtypes according to the St Gallen criteria from 2011. The associations with prognosis were examined using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression models.

resultsSurrogate molecular subtyping could be done in 381 cases. Mean follow up was 164 months. Of the classified DCIS 186 were Luminal A (48.8%), 33 Luminal B/HER2- (8.7%), 74 Luminal B/HER2+ (17.4%), 61 HER2+/ER- (16.0%) and 27 Triple Negative (7.1%). One hundred and two women had a local recurrence of which 58 were invasive. Twenty-two women had generalised disease, 8 without a prior local recurrence. We could not find a prognostic significance of the molecular subtypes other than a higher risk of developing breast cancer after more than 10 years of follow-up among women with a Triple Negative DCIS (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.1-9.8).

conclusionsThe results from this large population-based cohort, with long-term follow up failed to demonstrate a prognostic value for the surrogate molecular subtyping of DCIS using the St Gallen criteria up to ten years after diagnosis. More than ten years after diagnosis Triple Negative DCIS had an elevated risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell ProliferationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, EstrogenERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID24171825
PMCPMC4228470
OpenAlexW2111125083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.