Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24171437›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews2013

Friend or foe? The current epidemiologic evidence on selenium and human cancer risk.

Marco Vinceti, Catherine M Crespi, Carlotta Malagoli, Cinzia Del Giovane, Vittorio Krogh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exposure to Trace Elements and Risk of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Selenium for preventing cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Selenium for preventing cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Selenium at theFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Environmental Selenium and Human Health: an Update.Current environmental health reports · 2018
    Review
  17. Selenium-Binding Protein 1 in Human Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Causal Inference in Cancer Epidemiology: What Is the Role of Mendelian Randomization?Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco Vincetia Environmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology Research Center (CREAGEN) , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia , Modena , Italy.
Catherine M Crespi
Carlotta Malagoli
Cinzia Del Giovane
Vittorio Krogh

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific opinion on the relationship between selenium and the risk of cancer has undergone radical change over the years, with selenium first viewed as a possible carcinogen in the 1940s then as a possible cancer preventive agent in the 1960s-2000s. More recently, randomized controlled trials have found no effect on cancer risk but suggest possible low-dose dermatologic and endocrine toxicity, and animal studies indicate both carcinogenic and cancer-preventive effects. A growing body of evidence from human and laboratory studies indicates dramatically different biological effects of the various inorganic and organic chemical forms of selenium, which may explain apparent inconsistencies across studies. These chemical form-specific effects also have important implications for exposure and health risk assessment. Overall, available epidemiologic evidence suggests no cancer preventive effect of increased selenium intake in healthy individuals and possible increased risk of other diseases and disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMiceNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRatsRisk FactorsSeleniumSelenium

Identifiers

PMID24171437
PMCPMC3827666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.