Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24171436›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews2013

Understanding the gender disparity in bladder cancer risk: the impact of sex hormones and liver on bladder susceptibility to carcinogens.

Yuesheng Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Effect of co-occurring mutations inFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuesheng Zhanga Department of Cancer Prevention and Control , Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo , New York , USA.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Gender Disparity in Bladder Cancer and Chemopreventive InterventionR01CA164574 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ZHANG, YUESHENG · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Novel Dithiolethiones for Bladder Cancer PreventionR01CA120533 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ZHANG, YUESHENG · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
Bladder Cancer Chemoprevention with Allyl IsothiocyanateR01CA124627 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ZHANG, YUESHENG · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120533NCI NIH HHS R01CA120533NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124627NCI NIH HHS R01CA124627NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164574NCI NIH HHS R01CA164574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been known that bladder cancer (BC) incidence is approximately four-fold higher in men than in women in the United States, and a similar disparity also exists in other countries. The reason for this phenomenon is not known, which impedes progress in BC prevention. However, BC incidence is also significantly higher in male animals than in their female counterparts after treatment with aromatic amines, which are principal human bladder carcinogens. These animal studies and related studies in the context of available human data provide significant insight into what may drive the excessive BC risk in men, which is the focus of this article. The carcinogenicity and biotransformation of bladder carcinogens as well as the impact of sex hormones on these processes are discussed, highlighting the novel concept that the gender disparity in BC risk may result primarily from the interplay of androgen, estrogen, and liver, with the liver functioning via its metabolic enzymes as the main decider of bladder exposure to carcinogens in the urine and the male and female hormones exerting opposing effects on carcinogenesis in the bladder and likely also on liver enzymes handling bladder carcinogens. The findings may facilitate further investigation into the mechanism of gender disparity in BC risk and may also have important implications for BC prevention.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotransformationCarcinogens, EnvironmentalFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansLiverMaleMiceRatsRisk FactorsSex FactorsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCarcinogens, EnvironmentalGonadal Steroid Hormones

Identifiers

PMID24171436
PMCPMC3852434
OpenAlexW2042425867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.