ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2013
Motivational interviewing for adherence problems in cystic fibrosis; evaluation of training healthcare professionals.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A call for action: Educating pharmacists and pharmacy students in behaviour change techniques.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Clearing up the smoke: Physical and mental health considerations regarding cannabis use in adolescents with cystic fibrosis.Pediatric pulmonology · 2023Review
- Use of mucoactive agents in cystic fibrosis: A consensus survey of Italian specialists.Health science reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Delphi poll to assess consensus on issues influencing long-term adherence to treatments in cystic fibrosis among Italian health care professionals.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Managing treatment fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis on long-term therapy: the role of multiple sclerosis nurses.Patient preference and adherence · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMotivational interviewing (MI) offers effective strategies for enhancing behaviour change and is particularly useful for patients who exhibit poor adherence. This study evaluated MI training for cystic fibrosis (CF) teams, which comprised of one 4-hour workshop on MI principles, followed 6 months later by another on applying MI during brief consultations.
methodsHealth professionals (N = 60) from 7 teams completed questionnaires on learning outcomes 6 months after the first workshop, but before the second. Eleven participated in telephone-interview, 3 months after the second workshop.
resultsQuantitative analysis showed all participants used MI with a patient at least once after the first workshop and felt the approach was potentially helpful. Although self-appraisal of skill and confidence in MI was 'moderate', all felt confident in their ability to develop their skills and almost all intended to use MI in the future. Qualitative analysis confirmed the positive experiences of training and of using MI in practice, particularly in relationship building. However MI was utilised depending on team support and workload pressures.
conclusionsThis study showed that initial MI training with CF team-members resulted in increased knowledge and confidence about acquiring and applying MI techniques. However, this was balanced with consideration of barriers to application, further training needs and ongoing team-based support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.