Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24170599›Full record

ArticleGenome research2013

Integrating and mining the chromatin landscape of cell-type specificity using self-organizing maps.

Ali Mortazavi, Shirley Pepke, Camden Jansen, Georgi K Marinov, Jason Ernst, Manolis Kellis, Ross C Hardison, Richard M Myers, Barbara J Wold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Integrating ChIP-seq with other functional genomics data.Briefings in functional genomics · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. PCSD: a plant chromatin state database.Nucleic acids research · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bcl11b and combinatorial resolution of cell fate in the T-cell gene regulatory network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali MortazaviDepartment of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA;
Shirley Pepke
Camden Jansen
Georgi K Marinov
Jason Ernst
Manolis Kellis
Ross C Hardison
Richard M Myers
Barbara J Wold

Funding

Global Annotation of Regulatory Elements in the Human GenomeU54HG004576 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MYERS, RICHARD M · 2007 to 2011
$21.8M
Toward a comprehensive functional annotation of the human genomeU54HG006998 · NHGRI · HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY · PI MYERS, RICHARD M · 2012 to 2016
$17.5M
Global Predictions and Tests of Erythroid RegulationR01DK065806 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, CHIAROMONTE, FRANCESCA · 2004 to 2013
$5.3M
Regulatory Morif Discovery in the Human Genome Using Comparative GenomicsR01HG004037 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2007 to 2015
$3.9M
Enhance human ENCODE by function comparisons to mouseRC2HG005573 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HARDISON, ROSS C · 2009 to 2011
$2.2M
Global Predictions and Tests of Hematopoietic RegulationR56DK065806 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, BODINE, DAVID M. · 2014 to 2014
$224k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004037NHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005573NHGRI NIH HHS RC2HG005573NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004576NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG004576NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006998NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG006998NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065806NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK065806NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK065806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested whether self-organizing maps (SOMs) could be used to effectively integrate, visualize, and mine diverse genomics data types, including complex chromatin signatures. A fine-grained SOM was trained on 72 ChIP-seq histone modifications and DNase-seq data sets from six biologically diverse cell lines studied by The ENCODE Project Consortium. We mined the resulting SOM to identify chromatin signatures related to sequence-specific transcription factor occupancy, sequence motif enrichment, and biological functions. To highlight clusters enriched for specific functions such as transcriptional promoters or enhancers, we overlaid onto the map additional data sets not used during training, such as ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, CAGE, and information on cis-acting regulatory modules from the literature. We used the SOM to parse known transcriptional enhancers according to the cell-type-specific chromatin signature, and we further corroborated this pattern on the map by EP300 (also known as p300) occupancy. New candidate cell-type-specific enhancers were identified for multiple ENCODE cell types in this way, along with new candidates for ubiquitous enhancer activity. An interactive web interface was developed to allow users to visualize and custom-mine the ENCODE SOM. We conclude that large SOMs trained on chromatin data from multiple cell types provide a powerful way to identify complex relationships in genomic data at user-selected levels of granularity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell LineChromatinChromosome MappingComputational BiologyData MiningGene OntologyHistonesHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsK562 CellsPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsUser-Computer InterfaceChromatinHistonesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24170599
PMCPMC3847782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.