ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2014
The effect of head movement on CT perfusion summary maps: simulations with CT hybrid phantom data.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D movement correction of CT brain perfusion image data of patients with acute ischemic stroke.Neuroradiology · 2014Trial
- Dynamic CT perfusion image data compression for efficient parallel processing.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head movement is common during CT brain perfusion (CTP) acquisition of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The effects of this movement on the accuracy of CTP analysis has not been studied previously. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of head movement on CTP analysis summary maps using simulated phantom data. A dynamic digital CTP phantom dataset of 25 time frames with a simulated infarct volume was generated. Head movement was simulated by specific translations and rotations of the phantom data. Summary maps from this transformed phantom data were compared to the original data using the volumetric dice similarity coefficient (DSC). DSC for both penumbra and core strongly decreased for rotation angles larger than approximately 1°, 2°, and 7° for, respectively, pitch, roll, and yaw. The accuracy is also sensitive for small translations in the z-direction only. Sudden movements introduced larger errors than gradual movement. These results indicate that CTP summary maps are sensitive to head movement, even for small rotations and translations. CTP scans with head movement larger than the presented values should be interpreted with extra care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.