Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24170285›Full record

ArticleDer Radiologe2013

[Image-guided therapy with closed MRI: an update].

R Hoffmann, H Rempp, P L Pereira, S Clasen

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Radiologe, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R HoffmannAbteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland, ruediger.hoffmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
H Rempp
P L Pereira
S Clasen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsStandard imaging modalities for percutaneous minimally invasive therapy are ultrasound, fluoroscopy and computed tomography. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is becoming increasingly more popular for minimally invasive procedures. The advantages are high soft-tissue contrast, the possibility of free selection of multiple imaging slices, multiple tools for intrainterventional monitoring and the absence of ionizing radiation for the patient and the interventional radiologist. ACHIEVEMENTS: Magnetic resonance imaging is a promising imaging modality for minimally invasive procedures. The most common clinical applications are thermoablative procedures for treatment of hepatic, renal and prostatic malignancies.

Indexed as

HumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRadiography, InterventionalSurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.