ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2014
The compensation for asynchronous cardiac quiescence in coronary wall MR imaging.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of diaphragmatic and myocardial navigation in coronary magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Cine magnetic resonance imaging detects shorter cardiac rest periods in postcapillary pulmonary hypertension.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2014 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the incremental benefit of compensating asynchronous cardiac quiescence in coronary wall MR imaging. With the approval of IRB, black-blood coronary wall MR imaging was performed on 30 older subjects (90 coronary wall segments). For round 1 coronary wall MR imaging, acquisition windows were traditionally set within rest period(4-chamber). Totally 51 of 90 images were ranked as "good" images and resulted in an interpretability rate of 57%. Then, an additional cine-MR was centered at coronary segments to obtain rest period(cross-sectional). The rest period(overlap) (the intersection between rest period(4-chamber) and rest period(cross-sectional)) was measured for each coronary segment. The "good" images had a longer rest period(overlap) and higher acquisition coincidence rate (the percentage of acquisition window covered by the rest period(overlap)) than "poor" images. Coronary wall rescans (round 2) were completed at 39 coronary segments that were judged as having "poor" images in round 1 scans. The acquisition window was set within the rest period(overlap). For the round 2 images, 17 of 39 (44%) coronary segments were ranked as "good" images. The overall interpretability rate (68 of 90, 76%) was significantly higher than that of the round 1 images alone. Our data demonstrated that asynchronous cardiac quiescence adversely affects the performance of coronary wall MR imaging. Individualizing acquisition windows based on multi-plane cine-MR helps to compensate for this motion discrepancy and to improve image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.