Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24169649›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2014

Genome-wide profiling is a clinically relevant and affordable prognostic test in posterior uveal melanoma.

Nathalie Cassoux, Manuel Jorge Rodrigues, Corine Plancher, Bernard Asselain, Christine Levy-Gabriel, Livia Lumbroso-Le Rouic, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Rémi Dendale, Xavier Sastre, Laurence Desjardins and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advances in Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Diagnosing and Managing Primary Posterior Uveal Melanoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Choroidal Melanoma: A Mini Review.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nathalie CassouxDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Manuel Jorge RodriguesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Corine PlancherDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Curie 25 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Bernard AsselainDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Curie 25 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Christine Levy-GabrielDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Livia Lumbroso-Le RouicDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Sophie Piperno-NeumannDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Rémi DendaleDepartment of Radiotherapy Orsay Proton therapy, Center Institut Curie Orsay, Paris, France.
Xavier SastreDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie 25 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Laurence DesjardinsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Jérôme CouturierDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie 25 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated the capacity of genetic analysis of uveal melanoma samples to identify high-risk patients and discusses its clinical implications.

methodsPatients with posterior uveal melanoma were prospectively enrolled. Tumour samples were derived from enucleated globe, fine-needle aspirates or endoresection. Chromosome 3 and 8 status was determined by array comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH). Patients were followed after treatment to detect metastasis.

resultsFour groups were classified by array-CGH. Patients were divided into disomy 3 and normal chromosome 8 (D3/8nl), disomy 3 and 8q gain (D3/8g), monosomy 3 and normal chromosome 8 (M3/8nl) and monosomy 3 and 8 or 8q gain (M3/8g). Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 1-147 months). At the end of the study, 128 patients (33.7%) had developed metastasis and 96 patients had died. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that factors associated with metastasis included basal tumour diameter p=0.0007, tumour thickness p=0.01, mixed/epithelioid cell type p=0.0009 and genomic data p<0.0001. High-risk profile was more strongly associated with metastasis than the other prognostic factors p<0.001. Multivariate Cox modelling analysis showed that the status of chromosomes 3 and 8 were the only two variables that independently contributed to prognosis: monosomy 3 alone p=0.001 and monosomy 3 and 8q gain p<0.0001.

conclusionsArray-CGH allowed identification of three prognostic groups with low, intermediate and high risk of developing metastasis. Array-CGH is a reliable and inexpensive method for uveal melanoma prognosis. This method is now currently used in France.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 3Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Comparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMonosomyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisChoroidDiagnostic tests/InvestigationGeneticsPathology

Identifiers

PMID24169649
PMCPMC4033183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.