Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24169355›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2013

Phase II trial of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5FU chemotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic penis cancer (CRUK/09/001).

S Nicholson, E Hall, S J Harland, J D Chester, L Pickering, J Barber, T Elliott, A Thomson, S Burnett, C Cruickshank and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiological study of penile cancer in a northeastern state - Brazil.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Article
  15. Penile cancer: Updates in systemic therapy.Asian journal of urology · 2022
    Review
  16. Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Emerging Therapies in Penile Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

S NicholsonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK.
E Hall
S J Harland
J D Chester
L Pickering
J Barber
T Elliott
A Thomson
S Burnett
C Cruickshank
B Carrington
R Waters
A Bahl
Institute of Cancer Research · GBThe Christie Hospital · GBAt Bristol · GBCardiff University · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital · GBSt George's Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBVelindre Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15955Cancer Research UK C8262/A9765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPenis cancer is rare and clinical trial evidence on which to base treatment decisions is limited. Case reports suggest that the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-flurouracil (TPF) is highly active in this disease.

methodsTwenty-nine patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous carcinoma of the penis were recruited into a single-arm phase II trial from nine UK centres. Up to three cycles of chemotherapy were received (docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) day 1, cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) day 1, 5-flurouracil 750 mg m(-2) per day days 1-5, repeated every 3 weeks). Primary outcome was objective response (assessed by RECIST). Fourteen or more responses in 26 evaluable patients were required to confirm a response rate of 60% or higher (Fleming-A'Hern design), warranting further evaluation. Secondary endpoints included toxicity and survival.

results10/26 evaluable patients (38.5%, 95% CI: 20.2-59.4) achieved an objective response. Two patients with locally advanced disease achieved radiological complete remission. 65.5% of patients experienced at least one grade 3/4 adverse event.

conclusionDocetaxel, cisplatin and 5FU did not reach the pre-determined threshold for further research and caused significant toxicity. Our results do not support the routine use of TPF. The observed complete responses support further investigation of combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCisplatinDisease ProgressionDocetaxelFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPenile NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTaxoidsUnited KingdomCisplatinDocetaxelFluorouracilTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID24169355
PMCPMC3833214
OpenAlexW2076300269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.