Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24168350›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2013

Australian survey of current practice and guideline use in adult cancer pain assessment and management: perspectives of palliative care physicians.

Melanie Lovell, Meera Agar, Tim Luckett, Patricia M Davidson, Anna Green, Josephine Clayton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The use of interventional procedures for cancer pain. A brief review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Benefits of using the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with cancer pain: an intervention study conducted in Swedish hospitals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is it possible to detect an improvement in cancer pain management? A comparison of two Norwegian cross-sectional studies conducted 5 years apart.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie Lovell1 Department of Palliative Care , HammondCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .
Meera Agar
Tim Luckett
Patricia M Davidson
Anna Green
Josephine Clayton
University of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer pain continues to be undertreated, despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines. The Australian National Pain Strategy identified establishment of systems and guidelines to adequately manage cancer pain as a high priority.

objectivesThis study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to adult cancer pain assessment and management as perceived by Australian health professionals; establish the perceived need for new Australian guidelines and implementation strategies; identify which guidelines are used; and identify barriers and facilitators to guideline use. This article focuses on the perceptions of responding palliative care physicians.

designA cross-sectional survey was administered online.

participantsInvitations were circulated via peak bodies and clinical leaders. Comments were coded independently by two researchers.

resultsNinety-two palliative care physicians responded to the survey; 39% of the national total. The majority reported barriers to pain management, including insufficient access to nonpharmacologic interventions, poor coordination between services, and management challenges posed by comorbidities. Forty-five percent reported using pain guidelines, most commonly the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines-Palliative Care. Respondents were largely supportive of the development of new Australian guidelines and implementation strategies, in particular any offering advice on specific cases of cancer pain (e.g., neuropathic), patient self-management resources, assessment of patient priorities, and disciplinary roles.

conclusionBarriers to evidence-based practice identified by our survey might be addressed via strategies to support decision making and coordination of care (e.g., a clinical pathway). Particular attention should be paid to promoting access to nonpharmacologic interventions and patient education, and improving referral and care coordination.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePain ManagementPain MeasurementPalliative CarePractice Guidelines as TopicAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansIntractable PainMaleNeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID24168350
PMCPMC3822364
OpenAlexW2081662813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.