ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2013
Australian survey of current practice and guideline use in adult cancer pain assessment and management: perspectives of palliative care physicians.
Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Update of the Australian Guideline for the Management of Cancer Pain in Adults.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Challenges in opioid therapy implementation: national survey of palliative care consultation services.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- The implementation of guidelines in palliative care - a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- What is cancer pain? Investigating attitudes of patients, carers, and health professionals: A cross-sectional survey.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025Article
- The use of interventional procedures for cancer pain. A brief review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Review
- Availability of, Barriers to Performing, and Educational Practices of Interventional Procedures for Refractory Pain in Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Survey of Designated Cancer Hospitals in Japan.Palliative medicine reports · 2024Article
- A positive feedback loop of heparanase/syndecan1/nerve growth factor regulates cancer pain progression.The Korean journal of pain · 2023Article
- Availability of and factors related to interventional procedures for refractory pain in patients with cancer: a nationwide survey.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Benefits of using the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with cancer pain: an intervention study conducted in Swedish hospitals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- Article
- Critical attitudes and beliefs towards guidelines amongst palliative care professionals - results from a national survey.BMC palliative care · 2017Article
- Is it possible to detect an improvement in cancer pain management? A comparison of two Norwegian cross-sectional studies conducted 5 years apart.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Pain services and palliative medicine - an integrated approach to pain management in the cancer patient.British journal of pain · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer pain continues to be undertreated, despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines. The Australian National Pain Strategy identified establishment of systems and guidelines to adequately manage cancer pain as a high priority.
objectivesThis study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to adult cancer pain assessment and management as perceived by Australian health professionals; establish the perceived need for new Australian guidelines and implementation strategies; identify which guidelines are used; and identify barriers and facilitators to guideline use. This article focuses on the perceptions of responding palliative care physicians.
designA cross-sectional survey was administered online.
participantsInvitations were circulated via peak bodies and clinical leaders. Comments were coded independently by two researchers.
resultsNinety-two palliative care physicians responded to the survey; 39% of the national total. The majority reported barriers to pain management, including insufficient access to nonpharmacologic interventions, poor coordination between services, and management challenges posed by comorbidities. Forty-five percent reported using pain guidelines, most commonly the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines-Palliative Care. Respondents were largely supportive of the development of new Australian guidelines and implementation strategies, in particular any offering advice on specific cases of cancer pain (e.g., neuropathic), patient self-management resources, assessment of patient priorities, and disciplinary roles.
conclusionBarriers to evidence-based practice identified by our survey might be addressed via strategies to support decision making and coordination of care (e.g., a clinical pathway). Particular attention should be paid to promoting access to nonpharmacologic interventions and patient education, and improving referral and care coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.