ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2014
High dose droperidol and QT prolongation: analysis of continuous 12-lead recordings.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Safety of Medications for Severe Agitation: A Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0 Systematic Review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of droperidol for pediatric agitation in acute care settings.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- National survey of Dutch emergency physicians on pharmacological sedation practices for extreme agitation.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Prospective real-time evaluation of the QTc interval variation after low-dose droperidol among emergency department patients.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022Observational
- Respone to: "Limitations of Retrospective Chart Reviews to Determine Rare Events, and the Unknown Relative Risk of Droperidol".The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Antiemetic drugs: what to prescribe and when.Australian prescriber · 2020Review
- Pain medication and long QT syndrome.The Korean journal of pain · 2018Review
- QT interval prolongation in opioid agonist treatment: analysis of continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram recordings.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Prescribing preferences in rapid tranquillisation: a survey in Belgian psychiatrists and emergency physicians.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- Evidence-based review and appraisal of the use of droperidol in the emergency department.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the QT interval after high dose droperidol using continuous 12-lead Holter recordings.
methodsThis was a prospective study of patients given droperidol with a continuous Holter recording. Patients were recruited from the DORM II study which included patients with aggression presenting to the emergency department. Patients initially received 10 mg droperidol as part of a standardized sedation protocol. An additional 10 mg dose was given after 15 min if required and further doses at the clinical toxicologist's discretion. Continuous 12-lead Holter recordings were obtained for 2-24 h utilizing high resolution digital recordings with automated QT interval measurement. Electrocardiograms were extracted hourly from Holter recordings. The QT interval was plotted against heart rate (HR) on the QT nomogram to determine if it was abnormal. QTc F (Fridericia's HR correction) was calculated and >500 ms was defined as abnormal.
resultsForty-six patients had Holter recordings after 10-40 mg droperidol and 316 QT-HR pairs were included. There were 32 abnormal QT measurements in four patients, three given 10 mg and one 20 mg. In three of the four patients QTc F >500 ms but only in one taking methadone was the timing of QTc F >500 ms consistent with droperidol dosing. Of the three other patients, one took amphetamines, one still had QT prolongation 24 h after droperidol and one took a lamotrigine overdose. No patient given >30 mg had a prolonged QT. There were no arrhythmias.
conclusionQT prolongation was observed with high dose droperidol. However, there was little evidence supporting droperidol being the cause and QT prolongation was more likely due to pre-existing conditions or other drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.