Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24168031›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2013

DNA extraction from long-term stored urine.

Marc Hilhorst, Ruud Theunissen, Henk van Rie, Pieter van Paassen, Jan Willem Cohen Tervaert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A scoping review of factors influencing the implementation of liquid biopsy for cancer care.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Article
  3. Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Metabolic Diseases.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Circulating Nucleic Acid-Based Biomarkers of Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Serologic and urinary survey of exposure toJournal of feline medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc Hilhorst
Ruud Theunissen
Henk van Rie
Pieter van Paassen
Jan Willem Cohen TervaertClinical & Experimental Immunology, Maastricht University, P,O, Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. jw.cohentervaert@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, for DNA analyses, DNA is recovered from buffy coats. Since DNA in urine has been reported to deteriorate quickly, this option is often not considered. To complete our DNA database in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, we aimed to extract DNA from stored urine.

methodsUrine was stored at the time of kidney biopsy from patients included in our regional kidney biopsy database, who had given informed consent for further study. Urine was subsequently filtered, dialyzed, concentrated and freeze dried and finally resolubilized and centrifuged. DNA was extracted using the high pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics). Next, concentration and purity were determined by Nanodrop analysis and by Quant-iT analysis.

resultsOne hundred and eighty-one patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis were included. Of 114 patients (63%), DNA was available. From 53 of the remaining 67 patients, stored urine was available. Of the 53 samples that were processed, 46 (86.8%) yielded DNA with a mean concentration of 258.7 ng/μL (range 33.2-529) with a mean purity ratio of 1.81 (λ 260/280).

conclusionDNA extraction from fresh urine has been described before, yielding DNA usable for PCR analysis in healthy subjects. Storage of fresh urine at 4 °C or lower temperatures results in significant degradation of the DNA, making recovery of DNA more difficult with longer periods of storage. In the current study, we demonstrated that DNA could be retrieved from subsequently filtered, dialyzed, concentrated and freeze dried urine that was stored at room temperature. In addition, we demonstrated that this DNA could be used for PCR analysis. This method is useful when no other material from these patients is available.

Indexed as

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisDNADrug StorageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNetherlandsPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrevalenceSpecimen HandlingDNA

Identifiers

PMID24168031
PMCPMC4231352
OpenAlexW2157532057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.