ArticleBMC nephrology2013
DNA extraction from long-term stored urine.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary DNA Extraction in Uro-Oncology and Selected Non-Urological Malignancies: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A scoping review of factors influencing the implementation of liquid biopsy for cancer care.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Metabolic Diseases.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Review
- Article
- Circulating Nucleic Acid-Based Biomarkers of Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Serologic and urinary survey of exposure toJournal of feline medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Optimising storage conditions and processing of sheep urine for nitrogen cycle and gaseous emission measurements from urine patches.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Detecting HbE Gene Using DNA Extracted from Urine Sediments by Chelex-plus-Heating Technique.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2020Article
- Selection of a Noninvasive Source of Human DNA Envisaging Genotyping Assays in Epidemiological Studies: Urine or Saliva?Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2020Article
- How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Colorimetric Detection of Plasmodium vivax in Urine Using MSP10 Oligonucleotides and Gold Nanoparticles.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
- Urinary microRNA can be concentrated, dried on membranes and stored at room temperature in vacuum bags.PeerJ · 2015Article
- Comparative study of seven commercial kits for human DNA extraction from urine samples suitable for DNA biomarker-based public health studies.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally, for DNA analyses, DNA is recovered from buffy coats. Since DNA in urine has been reported to deteriorate quickly, this option is often not considered. To complete our DNA database in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, we aimed to extract DNA from stored urine.
methodsUrine was stored at the time of kidney biopsy from patients included in our regional kidney biopsy database, who had given informed consent for further study. Urine was subsequently filtered, dialyzed, concentrated and freeze dried and finally resolubilized and centrifuged. DNA was extracted using the high pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics). Next, concentration and purity were determined by Nanodrop analysis and by Quant-iT analysis.
resultsOne hundred and eighty-one patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis were included. Of 114 patients (63%), DNA was available. From 53 of the remaining 67 patients, stored urine was available. Of the 53 samples that were processed, 46 (86.8%) yielded DNA with a mean concentration of 258.7 ng/μL (range 33.2-529) with a mean purity ratio of 1.81 (λ 260/280).
conclusionDNA extraction from fresh urine has been described before, yielding DNA usable for PCR analysis in healthy subjects. Storage of fresh urine at 4 °C or lower temperatures results in significant degradation of the DNA, making recovery of DNA more difficult with longer periods of storage. In the current study, we demonstrated that DNA could be retrieved from subsequently filtered, dialyzed, concentrated and freeze dried urine that was stored at room temperature. In addition, we demonstrated that this DNA could be used for PCR analysis. This method is useful when no other material from these patients is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.