Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24167484›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2013

Inhibition among olfactory receptor neurons.

Wynand Van der Goes van Naters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Novel mechanisms of chemosensory adaptation to the cave environment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. An evolutionarily conserved cation channel tunes the sensitivity of gustatory neurons to ephaptic inhibition inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. eLife · 2024
    Article
  4. Olfactory systems across mosquito species.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Two Forms of Electrical Transmission Between Neurons.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wynand Van der Goes van NatersSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002758/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Often assumed to be epiphenomena of a cell's activity, extracellular currents and resulting potential changes are increasingly recognized to influence the function of other cells in the vicinity. Experimental evidence shows that even small electric fields can modulate spike timing in neurons. Moreover, when neurons are brought close together experimentally or in pathological conditions, activity in one neuron can excite its neighbors. Inhibitory ephaptic mechanisms, however, may depend on more specialized coupling among cells. Recent studies in the Drosophila olfactory system have shown that excitation of a sensory neuron can inhibit its neighbor, and it was speculated that this interaction was ephaptic. Here we give an overview of ephaptic interactions that effect changes in spike timing, excitation or inhibition in diverse systems with potential relevance to human neuroscience. We examine the mechanism of the inhibitory interaction in the Drosophila system and that of the well-studied ephaptic inhibition of the Mauthner cell in more detail. We note that both current towards and current away from the local extracellular environment of a neuron can inhibit it, but the mechanism depends on the specific architecture of each system.

Indexed as

Drosophilaephapticinhibitionolfactionsensillumsensory neurons

Identifiers

PMID24167484
PMCPMC3805947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.