Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24167311›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Reproductive competition between females in the matrilineal Mosuo of southwestern China.

Ting Ji, Jia-Jia Wu, Qiao-Qiao He, Jing-Jing Xu, Ruth Mace, Yi Tao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Female cooperation: evolutionary, cross-cultural and ethnographic evidence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Kin networks and opportunities for reproductive cooperation and conflict among hunter-gatherers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The expendable male hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Kinship ties across the lifespan in human communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Kinship as a frequency dependent strategy.Royal Society open science · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Female competition and aggression: interdisciplinary perspectives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  20. Marriage stability in a pastoralist society.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ting JiKey Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Centre for Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, , Beijing 100101, China.
Jia-Jia Wu
Qiao-Qiao He
Jing-Jing Xu
Ruth Mace
Yi Tao
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity College London · GBBeijing Normal University · CNInstitute of Zoology · CN

Funding

European Research Council 249347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The matrilineal Mosuo of southwestern China live in communal households where brothers and sisters of three generations live together (duolocal residence), and men visit their wives, who reside elsewhere, only at night in 'visiting' marriages. Here we show that these communally breeding sisters are in reproductive conflict, in the sense that they share the resources needed to reproduce. We analyse determinants of reproductive success in females and males, and show that co-resident female kin are in competition; the more female kin reside in the household, the more reproductive success is reduced. Male reproductive success, however, is not determined by the kin in his natal household; duolocal males are not in reproductive conflict with their siblings. Competition with female cousins can be worse than that between sisters. We also find that female work on the farm (which is the main communal resource) is not equal. We use a 'tug-of-war' model of reproductive skew generated by incomplete control, to model the patterns of effort put into competition between sisters and cousins. The model predicts that more dominant (older) sisters will put less effort into reproductive conflict than will less dominant (younger) sisters; but younger sisters will also have lower reproductive success because they are less efficient at gaining access to the shared resource. Both predictions are consistent with our data. Younger sisters work less in the fields than do older sisters, which may represent a form of conflict or may be because their average relatedness to the household is lower than that of their more fertile older sisters.

Indexed as

Competitive BehaviorFamily CharacteristicsReproductionChinaFamilyFemaleGame TheoryHumansMaleRegression Analysisanthropologycommunal breedingconflictcooperationfamilymatriliny

Identifiers

PMID24167311
PMCPMC3826210
OpenAlexW2125861340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.