Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24167307›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Female competition in chimpanzees.

Anne E Pusey, Kara Schroepfer-Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Female Affiliation and Status in Semi-Free-Ranging Chimpanzees.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Coalitional Support Regulates Resource Divisions in Men.Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reproductive inequality among males in the genusPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Human cooperation and evolutionary transitions in individuality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Weak, but not strong, ties support coalition formation among wild female chimpanzees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. When fertile, women seek status via prestige but not dominance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Warlike chimpanzees and peacemaking bonobos.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne E PuseyDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, , PO Box 90383, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Kara Schroepfer-Walker
Duke University · USWalker (United States) · US

Funding

PHS HHS R01 A1058715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female chimpanzees exhibit exceptionally slow rates of reproduction and raise their offspring without direct paternal care. Therefore, their reproductive success depends critically on long-term access to high-quality food resources over a long lifespan. Chimpanzee communities contain multiple adult males, multiple adult females and their offspring. Because males are philopatric and jointly defend the community range while most females transfer to new communities before breeding, adult females are typically surrounded by unrelated competitors. Communities are fission-fusion societies in which individuals spend time alone or in fluid subgroups, whose size depends mostly on the abundance and distribution of food. To varying extents in different populations, females avoid direct competition by foraging alone or in small groups in distinct, but overlapping core areas within the community range to which they show high fidelity. Although rates of aggression are low, females compete for space and access to food. High rank correlates with high reproductive success, and high-ranking females win direct contests for food and gain preferential access to resource-rich sites. Females are aggressive to immigrant females and even kill the newborn infants of community members. The intensity of such aggression correlates with population density. These patterns are compared to those in other species, including humans.

Indexed as

Food SupplyAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBehavior, AnimalCompetitive BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePan troglodytesReproductionaggression to immigrantsdominancefemale transferinfanticideresource competition

Identifiers

PMID24167307
PMCPMC3826206
OpenAlexW2077182473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.