Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24167064›Full record

ArticleMolecular reproduction and development2014

Reshaping the transcriptional frontier: epigenetics and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Charles R Long, Mark E Westhusin, Michael C Golding

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular reproduction and development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Sheep and Approaches to Improve Efficiency.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetic Reprogramming and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Insights from one thousand cloned dogs.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Manipulating the Epigenome in Nuclear Transfer Cloning: Where, When and How.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Lessons Learned from Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles R LongDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Mark E Westhusin
Michael C Golding
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Functional Analysis of the Embryonic Epigenome in a Non-rodent ModelR01HD058969 · NICHD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI WESTHUSIN, MARK E · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Inducible Tissue-Specific Transgene Expression in Large Animal Biomedical ModelsR24OD011188 · OD · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI LONG, CHARLES R · 2012 to 2014
$1.3M
Analysis of epigenetic regulation in early mammalian embryos via RNA interferenceR21HD055631 · NICHD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI LONG, CHARLES R · 2009 to 2010
$532k
Measuring the impact of prenatal alcohol exposure on the fetal epigenomeR03AA020129 · NIAAA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDING, MICHAEL C. · 2010 to 2011
$136k
NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA020129NIAAA NIH HHS R03AA020129NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD058969-01A2NICHD NIH HHS 1R21HD055631-01A2NICHD NIH HHS 3R21HD055631-02S1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058969NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD055631NIH HHS 5R24OD011188-03NIH HHS R24 OD011188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic-cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) experiments have paved the way to the field of cellular reprogramming. The demonstrated ability to clone over 20 different species to date has proven that the technology is robust but very inefficient, and is prone to developmental anomalies. Yet, the offspring from cloned animals exhibit none of the abnormalities of their parents, suggesting the low efficiency and high developmental mortality are epigenetic in origin. The epigenetic barriers to reprogramming somatic cells into a totipotent embryo capable of developing into a viable offspring are significant and varied. Despite their intimate relationship, chromatin structure and transcription are often not uniformly reprogramed after nuclear transfer, and many cloned embryos develop gene expression profiles that are hybrids between the donor cell and an embryonic blastomere. Recent advances in cellular reprogramming suggest that alteration of donor-cell chromatin structure towards that found in an normal embryo is actually the rate-limiting step in successful development of SCNT embryos. Here we review the literature relevant to the transformation of a somatic-cell nucleus into an embryo capable of full-term development. Interestingly, while resetting somatic transcription and associated epigenetic marks are absolutely required for development of SCNT embryos, life does not demand perfection.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticNuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID24167064
PMCPMC3953569
OpenAlexW1606867819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.