Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24166878›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2013

Structural basis of ion permeation gating in Slo2.1 K+ channels.

Priyanka Garg, Alison Gardner, Vivek Garg, Michael C Sanguinetti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular mechanisms of Slo2 KThe Journal of physiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Pore size matters for potassium channel conductance.The Journal of general physiology · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka GargNora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, 2 Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and 3 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Alison Gardner
Vivek Garg
Michael C Sanguinetti
Harrison Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Physiology and Biophysics of Cardiac Slo2.1 ChannelsR01HL103877 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SANGUINETTI, MICHAEL CRAIG, ZAITSEV, ALEXEY V · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103877NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL103877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activation gate of ion channels controls the transmembrane flux of permeant ions. In voltage-gated K(+) channels, the aperture formed by the S6 bundle crossing can widen to open or narrow to close the ion permeation pathway, whereas the selectivity filter gates ion flux in cyclic-nucleotide gated (CNG) and Slo1 channels. Here we explore the structural basis of the activation gate for Slo2.1, a weakly voltage-dependent K(+) channel that is activated by intracellular Na(+) and Cl(-). Slo2.1 channels were heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and activated by elevated [NaCl]i or extracellular application of niflumic acid. In contrast to other voltage-gated channels, Slo2.1 was blocked by verapamil in an activation-independent manner, implying that the S6 bundle crossing does not gate the access of verapamil to its central cavity binding site. The structural basis of Slo2.1 activation was probed by Ala scanning mutagenesis of the S6 segment and by mutation of selected residues in the pore helix and S5 segment. Mutation to Ala of three S6 residues caused reduced trafficking of channels to the cell surface and partial (K256A, I263A, Q273A) or complete loss (E275A) of channel function. P271A Slo2.1 channels trafficked normally, but were nonfunctional. Further mutagenesis and intragenic rescue by second site mutations suggest that Pro271 and Glu275 maintain the inner pore in an open configuration by preventing formation of a tight S6 bundle crossing. Mutation of several residues in S6 and S5 predicted by homology modeling to contact residues in the pore helix induced a gain of channel function. Substitution of the pore helix residue Phe240 with polar residues induced constitutive channel activation. Together these findings suggest that (1) the selectivity filter and not the bundle crossing gates ion permeation and (2) dynamic coupling between the pore helix and the S5 and S6 segments mediates Slo2.1 channel activation.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCalcium Channel BlockersHumansIon Channel GatingModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesisOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesPotassium ChannelsPotassium Channels, Sodium-ActivatedProtein Structure, SecondarySodium ChlorideStructure-Activity RelationshipVerapamilCalcium Channel BlockersKCNT2 protein, humanPotassium ChannelsPotassium Channels, Sodium-ActivatedSodium ChlorideVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID24166878
PMCPMC3813382
OpenAlexW1985014505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.