ArticleProteins2014
Protein function annotation by local binding site surface similarity.
Article in Proteins, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2024Article
- Ellagic acid improves the symptoms of early-onset Alzheimer's disease: Behavioral and physiological correlates.Heliyon · 2024Article
- SiteMotif: A graph-based algorithm for deriving structural motifs in Protein Ligand binding sites.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Chemometric Models of Differential Amino Acids at the NaMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Electrostatic-field and surface-shape similarity for virtual screening and pose prediction.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2019Article
- Modeling enzyme-ligand binding in drug discovery.Journal of cheminformatics · 2015Review
- Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2015Article
- Chemical and protein structural basis for biological crosstalk between PPARα and COX enzymes.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hundreds of protein crystal structures exist for proteins whose function cannot be confidently determined from sequence similarity. Surflex-PSIM, a previously reported surface-based protein similarity algorithm, provides an alternative method for hypothesizing function for such proteins. The method now supports fully automatic binding site detection and is fast enough to screen comprehensive databases of protein binding sites. The binding site detection methodology was validated on apo/holo cognate protein pairs, correctly identifying 91% of ligand binding sites in holo structures and 88% in apo structures where corresponding sites existed. For correctly detected apo binding sites, the cognate holo site was the most similar binding site 87% of the time. PSIM was used to screen a set of proteins that had poorly characterized functions at the time of crystallization, but were later biochemically annotated. Using a fully automated protocol, this set of 8 proteins was screened against ∼60,000 ligand binding sites from the PDB. PSIM correctly identified functional matches that predated query protein biochemical annotation for five out of the eight query proteins. A panel of 12 currently unannotated proteins was also screened, resulting in a large number of statistically significant binding site matches, some of which suggest likely functions for the poorly characterized proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.