Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24166526›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2013

Practice patterns and long-term survival for early-stage rectal cancer.

Karyn B Stitzenberg, Hanna K Sanoff, Dolly C Penn, Michael O Meyers, Joel E Tepper

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Excision, and Observation for Early Rectal Cancer: The Phase II NEO Trial (CCTG CO.28) Primary End Point Results.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Lymph node metastasis in T1-2 colorectal cancer: a population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Lymph Node Positivity in T1/T2 Rectal Cancer: a Word of Caution in an Era of Increased Incidence and Changing Biology for Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karyn B StitzenbergAll authors: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and Karyn B. Stitzenberg, Hanna K. Sanoff, Michael O. Meyers, and Joel E. Tepper, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
Hanna K Sanoff
Dolly C Penn
Michael O Meyers
Joel E Tepper
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000083 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2012 to 2013
$11.6M
Academic Training in Oncology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel HillT32CA128590 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A · 2008 to 2012
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000083NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000083NCI NIH HHS T32 5T32CA128590-04NCI NIH HHS T32 CA128590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStandard of care treatment for most stage I rectal cancers is total mesorectal excision (TME). Given the morbidity associated with TME, local excision (LE) for early-stage rectal cancer has been explored. This study examines practice patterns and overall survival (OS) for early-stage rectal cancer.

methodsAll patients in the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed with rectal cancer from 1998 to 2010 were initially included. Use of LE versus proctectomy and use of adjuvant radiation therapy were compared over time. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare OS based on treatment.

resultsLE was used to treat 46.5% of patients with T1 and 16.8% with T2 tumors. Use of LE increased steadily over time (P < .001). LE was most commonly used for women, black patients, very old patients, those without private health insurance, those with well-differentiated tumors, and those with T1 tumors. Proctectomy was associated with higher rates of tumor-free surgical margins compared with LE (95% v 76%; P < .001). Adjuvant radiation therapy use decreased over time independent of surgical procedure or T stage. For T2N0 disease, patients treated with LE alone had significantly poorer adjusted OS than those treated with proctectomy alone or multimodality therapy.

conclusionGuideline-concordant adoption of LE for treatment of low-risk stage I rectal cancer is increasing. However, use of LE is also increasing for higher-risk rectal cancers that do not meet guideline criteria for LE. Treatment with LE alone is associated with poorer long-term OS. Additional studies are warranted to understand the factors driving increased use of LE.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChi-Square DistributionFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPractice Guidelines as TopicProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID24166526
PMCPMC3837090
OpenAlexW2101086618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.