Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24166207›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2014

New developments in the evolution and application of the WHO/IPCS framework on mode of action/species concordance analysis.

M E Meek, A Boobis, I Cote, V Dellarco, G Fotakis, S Munn, J Seed, C Vickers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. An updated systematic review on the possible effect of nonylphenol on male fertility.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Systematic evaluation of the evidence base on ethylCurrent research in toxicology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Systematic evaluation of the evidence base on methylCurrent research in toxicology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Adverse Outcome Pathways Mechanistically Describing Hepatotoxicity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M E MeekChemical Risk Assessment, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, 1 Stewart Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5.
A Boobis
I Cote
V Dellarco
G Fotakis
S Munn
J Seed
C Vickers

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization/International Programme on Chemical Safety mode of action/human relevance framework has been updated to reflect the experience acquired in its application and extend its utility to emerging areas in toxicity testing and non-testing methods. The underlying principles have not changed, but the framework's scope has been extended to enable integration of information at different levels of biological organization and reflect evolving experience in a much broader range of potential applications. Mode of action/species concordance analysis can also inform hypothesis-based data generation and research priorities in support of risk assessment. The modified framework is incorporated within a roadmap, with feedback loops encouraging continuous refinement of fit-for-purpose testing strategies and risk assessment. Important in this construct is consideration of dose-response relationships and species concordance analysis in weight of evidence. The modified Bradford Hill considerations have been updated and additionally articulated to reflect increasing experience in application for cases where the toxicological outcome of chemical exposure is known. The modified framework can be used as originally intended, where the toxicological effects of chemical exposure are known, or in hypothesizing effects resulting from chemical exposure, using information on putative key events in established modes of action from appropriate in vitro or in silico systems and other lines of evidence. This modified mode of action framework and accompanying roadmap and case examples are expected to contribute to improving transparency in explicitly addressing weight of evidence considerations in mode of action/species concordance analysis based on both conventional data sources and evolving methods.

Indexed as

World Health OrganizationAnimalsHumansModels, AnimalRisk AssessmentToxicity Testsadverse outcome pathwaycellular responsehuman relevance frameworkkey eventsmode of actionmodified Bradford Hill considerationsmolecular targetspecies concordance analysistissue responseweight of evidence approach

Identifiers

PMID24166207
PMCPMC6701984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.