Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24165990›Full record

ArticleHerz2013

[Etiology, diagnosis, management, and treatment of myocarditis. Position paper from the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases].

S Pankuweit, B Maisch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herz, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian Society of Cardiology Guideline on Myocarditis - 2022.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S PankuweitKlinik für Innere Medizin - Kardiologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Deutschland, pankuwei@staff.uni-marburg.de.
B Maisch
Herder Institute · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite great advances in the pathophysiology and etiology of myocarditis, the clinical diagnosis of myocarditis in daily clinical practise remains challenging. Often the diagnosis was not clear because of the heterogeneity of clinical symptoms and the lack of guidelines for adequate diagnostic requirements and consecutive treatment options. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases established a working group of experts to improve the diagnosis and management of myocarditis and to provide a common consensus statement as a reference for future registries and controlled trials. The goal was to bridge the gap between clinical- and tissue-based diagnosis by formulating a concept concerning essential diagnostics and treatment of these patients that would be accepted across Europe. Only in this manner is it possible to establish a basis for national and international registries and double-blind randomized treatment trials for the etiologically differentiated treatment of myocarditis, which appear promising due to numerous studies in recent years. In this paper, two members from the expert working group summarize the most important aspects of this position paper on the etiology, diagnosis, management, and treatment of myocarditis, which were published in the July 2013 issue of European Heart Joumal.

Indexed as

CardiologyEuropeEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMyocarditis

Identifiers

PMID24165990
OpenAlexW1245136392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.