Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24165392›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Toni Zhong, Claire Temple-Oberle, Stefan O P Hofer, Stefan Hofer, Brett Beber, John Semple, Mitchell Brown, Sheina Macadam, Peter Lennox, Tony Panzarella and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00956384 (Acellular Dermal Matrix in One-Stage Breast Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00956384 nacompletednot on this map

Acellular Dermal Matrix in One-Stage Breast Reconstruction: A RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2009 to 2017Enrolled198ConditionsBreast CancerArmsOne-stage dermal matrix/implant procedure, Two-stage tissue expander/implant procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioresorbable scaffold as a dermal substitute.International journal of burns and trauma · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Toni ZhongDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. toni.zhong@uhn.ca.
Claire Temple-Oberle
Stefan O P Hofer
Stefan Hofer
Brett Beber
John Semple
Mitchell Brown
Sheina Macadam
Peter Lennox
Tony Panzarella
Colleen McCarthy
Nancy Baxter
MCCAT Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe two-stage tissue expander/implant (TE/I) reconstruction is currently the gold standard method of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in North America. Recently, however, there have been numerous case series describing the use of one-stage direct to implant reconstruction with the aid of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). In order to rigorously investigate the novel application of ADM in one-stage implant reconstruction, we are currently conducting a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the impact on patient satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) compared to the two-stage TE/I technique. METHODS/DESIGNS: The MCCAT study is a multicenter Canadian ADM trial designed as a two-arm parallel superiority trial that will compare ADM-facilitated one-stage implant reconstruction compared to two-stage TE/I reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. The source population will be members of the mastectomy cohort with stage T0 to TII disease, proficient in English, over the age of 18 years, and planning to undergo SSM or NSM with immediate implant breast reconstruction. Stratified randomization will maintain a balanced distribution of important prognostic factors (study site and unilateral versus bilateral procedures). The primary outcome is patient satisfaction and QOL as measured by the validated and procedure-specific BREAST-Q. Secondary outcomes include short- and long-term complications, long-term aesthetic outcomes using five standardized photographs graded by three independent blinded observers, and a cost effectiveness analysis. DISCUSSION: There is tremendous interest in using ADM in implant breast reconstruction, particularly in the setting of one-stage direct to implant reconstruction where it was previously not possible without the intermediary use of a temporary tissue expander (TE). This unique advantage has led many patients and surgeons alike to believe that one-stage ADM-assisted implant reconstruction should be the procedure of choice and should be offered to patients as the first-line treatment. We argue that it is crucial that this technique be scientifically evaluated in terms of patient selection, surgical technique, complications, aesthetic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and most importantly patient-reported outcomes before it is promoted as the new gold standard in implant-based breast reconstruction.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00956384.

Indexed as

Acellular DermisBreast ImplantsMastectomyResearch DesignBreast ImplantationBreast NeoplasmsCanadaClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansNeoplasm StagingPatient SatisfactionProsthesis DesignQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID24165392
PMCPMC3842809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.