Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24165044›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2014

Novel MRI tests of orocecal transit time and whole gut transit time: studies in normal subjects.

G Chaddock, C Lam, C L Hoad, C Costigan, E F Cox, E Placidi, I Thexton, J Wright, P E Blackshaw, A C Perkins and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01534507 completednot on this map

Optimising Measurement of Small and Large Bowel Transit During MRI Scanning and Characterising IBS Subtypes and Their Response to Stress Using MRI (Study 1)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2011 to 2014Enrolled108ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT02551289 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

MRI Assessment in Newly Diagnosed Coeliac Disease and Following Gluten-free Diet Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2016 to 2019Enrolled72ConditionsCeliac Disease, Coeliac Disease, Celiac Sprue, Gluten EnteropathyArmsGluten free diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G ChaddockSir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
C Lam
C L Hoad
C Costigan
E F Cox
E Placidi
I Thexton
J Wright
P E Blackshaw
A C Perkins
L Marciani
P A Gowland
R C Spiller
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonic transit tests are used to manage patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Some tests used expose patients to ionizing radiation. The aim of this study was to compare novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tests for measuring orocecal transit time (OCTT) and whole gut transit time (WGT), which also provide data on colonic volumes.

methods21 healthy volunteers participated. Study 1: OCTT was determined from the arrival of the head of a meal into the cecum using MRI and the Lactose Ureide breath test (LUBT), performed concurrently. Study 2: WGT was assessed using novel MRI marker capsules and radio-opaque markers (ROMs), taken on the same morning. Studies were repeated 1 week later. KEY

resultsOCTT measured using MRI and LUBT was 225 min (IQR 180-270) and 225 min (IQR 165-278), respectively, correlation r(s) = 0.28 (ns). WGT measured using MRI marker capsules and ROMs was 28 h (IQR 4-50) and 31 h ± 3 (SEM), respectively, correlation r(s) = 0.85 (p < 0.0001). Repeatability assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.45 (p = 0.017) and 0.35 (p = 0.058) for MRI and LUBT OCTT tests. Better repeatability was observed for the WGT tests, ICC being 0.61 for the MRI marker capsules (p = 0.001) and 0.69 for the ROM method (p < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The MRI WGT method is simple, convenient, does not use X-ray and compares well with the widely used ROM method. Both OCTT measurements showed modest reproducibility and the MRI method showed modest inter-observer agreement.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBreath TestsCecumFemaleGastrointestinal TransitHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultcorrelationmarker capsuleMRItransit time

Identifiers

PMID24165044
PMCPMC4285997
OpenAlexW1977833142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.