ArticleBiochemistry2013
A novel assay for detecting fusion pore formation: implications for the fusion mechanism.
Article in Biochemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leaflet by Leaflet Synergistic Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides on Bacterial and Mammalian Membrane Models.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane fusion is broadly envisioned as a two- or three-step process proceeding from contacting bilayers through one or two semistable, nonlamellar lipidic intermediate structures to a fusion pore. A true fusion event requires mixing of contents between compartments and is monitored by the movement of soluble molecules between trapped compartments. We have used poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) to rapidly generate an ensemble aggregated state A that proceeds sequentially through intermediates (I₁ and/or I₂) to a final fusion pore state (FP) with rate constants k₁, k₂, and k₃. Movement of moderately sized solutes (e.g., Tb³⁺/dipicolinic acid) has been used to detect pores assigned to intermediate states as well as to the final state (FP). Analysis of ensemble kinetic data has required that mixing of contents occurs with defined probabilities (αi) in each ensemble state, although it is unclear whether pores that form in different states are different. We introduce here a simple new assay that employs fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between a 6-carboxyfluorescein (donor) and tetramethylrhodamine (acceptor), which are covalently attached to complementary sequences of 10 bp oligonucleotides. Complementary sequences of fluorophore-labeled oligonucleotides were incorporated in vesicles separately, and the level of FRET increased in a simple exponential fashion during PEG-mediated fusion. The resulting rate constant corresponded closely to the slow rate constant of FP formation (k₃) derived from small molecule assays. Additionally, the total extent of oligonucleotide mixing corresponded to the fraction of content mixing that occurred in state FP in the small molecule assay. The results show that both large "final pores" and small (presumably transient) pores can form between vesicles throughout the fusion process. The implications of this result for the mechanism of membrane fusion are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.