Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24164239›Full record

ReviewHuman gene therapy2013

Gene therapy delivery systems for enhancing viral and nonviral vectors for cardiac diseases: current concepts and future applications.

Michael G Katz, Anthony S Fargnoli, Richard D Williams, Charles R Bridges

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human gene therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Implementing genome-driven personalized cardiology in clinical practice.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2018
    Review
  18. Delivery strategies of the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system for therapeutic applications.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Destination Brain: the Past, Present, and Future of Therapeutic Gene Delivery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael G KatzSanger Heart and Vascular Institute , Cannon Research Center, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203.
Anthony S Fargnoli
Richard D Williams
Charles R Bridges

Funding

Translational Studies in Heart Failure Gene TherapyR01HL083078 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRIDGES, CHARLES R · 2007 to 2018
$9.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1-R01-HL083078-01A2NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy is one of the most promising fields for developing new treatments for the advanced stages of ischemic and monogenetic, particularly autosomal or X-linked recessive, cardiomyopathies. The remarkable ongoing efforts in advancing various targets have largely been inspired by the results that have been achieved in several notable gene therapy trials, such as the hemophilia B and Leber's congenital amaurosis. Rate-limiting problems preventing successful clinical application in the cardiac disease area, however, are primarily attributable to inefficient gene transfer, host responses, and the lack of sustainable therapeutic transgene expression. It is arguable that these problems are directly correlated with the choice of vector, dose level, and associated cardiac delivery approach as a whole treatment system. Essentially, a delicate balance exists in maximizing gene transfer required for efficacy while remaining within safety limits. Therefore, the development of safe, effective, and clinically applicable gene delivery techniques for selected nonviral and viral vectors will certainly be invaluable in obtaining future regulatory approvals. The choice of gene transfer vector, dose level, and the delivery system are likely to be critical determinants of therapeutic efficacy. It is here that the interactions between vector uptake and trafficking, delivery route means, and the host's physical limits must be considered synergistically for a successful treatment course.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAdenoviridaeAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesDependovirusElectroporationGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansLentivirusMicroinjectionsMyocardium

Identifiers

PMID24164239
PMCPMC3814977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.