ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2013
Development of the research lifecycle model for library services.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A needs assessment survey for improving library support for chiropractic faculty research.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2026Article
- Needs assessment for improving library support for dentistry researchers.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019Article
- Alignment of library services with the research lifecycle.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019Article
- The research life cycle and the health sciences librarian: responding to change in scholarly communication.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017Review
- Academic librarians at play in the field of cheminformatics: building the case for chemistry research data management.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
questionCan the niche services of individual librarians across multiple libraries be developed into a suite of standard services available to all scientists that support the entire research lifecycle?
settingServices at a large, research-intensive state university campus are described.
methodInitial data were collected via concept mapping by librarians. Additional data were collected at conferences and meetings through interactive poster presentations. MAIN
resultsServices of interest to scientists for each of the stages in the research lifecycle were developed by the team to reflect the wide range of strengths of team members in aggregate.
conclusionInput from researchers was the most effective tool for developing the model. A flexible research lifecycle model can be developed to match the needs of different service groups and the skills of different librarians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.