Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24163601›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2013

The librarian as research informationist: a case study.

Lisa Federer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Alignment of library services with the research lifecycle.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving data collection, documentation, and workflow in a dementia screening study.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017
    Article
  5. Scoping reviews: establishing the role of the librarian.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lisa Federerlmfederer@library.ucla.edu , Research Informationist, UCLA Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library, University of California-Los Angeles, 12-077 Center for Health Sciences, Box 951798, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Funding

Non-Contact, THz Sensing of Corneal HydrationR01EY021590 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GRUNDFEST, WARREN S · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionHow can an embedded research informationist add value to the scientific output of research teams?

settingThe University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library is an academic health sciences library serving the clinical, educational, and research needs of the UCLA community.

methodsA grant from the National Library of Medicine funded a librarian to join a UCLA research team as an informationist. The informationist meets regularly with the research team and provides guidance related to data management, preservation, and other information-related issues. MAIN

resultsEarly results suggest that the informationist's involvement has influenced the team's data gathering, storage, and curation methods. The UCLA Library has also changed the librarian's title to research informationist to reflect the new activities that she performs.

conclusionThe research informationist role provides an opportunity for librarians to become effective members of research teams and improve research output.

Indexed as

LibrariansLibraries, MedicalAcademic Medical CentersBiomedical ResearchHumansLibrary ServicesProfessional RoleWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID24163601
PMCPMC3794685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.