Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24163599›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2013

Emerging roles for biomedical librarians: a survey of current practice, challenges, and changes.

Janet A Crum, I Diane Cooper

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical informationist educational needs and goals: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Needs assessment for improving library support for dentistry researchers.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet A Crumjcrum@coh.org , Director, Library Services, Lee Graff Medical and Scientific Library, City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010.
I Diane Cooper
City Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study is intended to (1) identify emerging roles for biomedical librarians and determine how common these roles are in a variety of library settings, (2) identify barriers to taking on new roles, and (3) determine how librarians are developing the capacity to take on new roles.

methodsA survey was conducted of librarians in biomedical settings.

resultsMost biomedical librarians are taking on new roles. The most common roles selected by survey respondents include analysis and enhancement of user experiences, support for social media, support for systematic reviews, clinical informationist, help for faculty or staff with authorship issues, and implementation of researcher profiling and collaboration tools. Respondents in academic settings are more likely to report new roles than hospital librarians are, but some new roles are common in both settings. Respondents use a variety of methods to free up time for new roles, but predominant methods vary between directors and librarians and between academic and hospital respondents. Lack of time is the biggest barrier that librarians face when trying to adopt new roles. New roles are associated with increased collaboration with individuals and/or groups outside the library. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This survey documents the widespread incorporation of new roles in biomedical libraries in the United States, as well as the barriers to adopting these roles and the means by which librarians are making time for them. The results of the survey can be used to inform strategic planning, succession planning, library education, and career development for biomedical librarians.

Indexed as

LibrariansLibraries, MedicalProfessional RoleData CollectionHumansWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID24163599
PMCPMC3794683
OpenAlexW2081077152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.