Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24163359›Full record

ArticleThe Diabetes educator

Assessment of a short diabetes knowledge instrument for older and minority adults.

Sara A Quandt, Edward H Ip, Julienne K Kirk, Santiago Saldana, Shyh-Huei Chen, Ha Nguyen, Ronny A Bell, Thomas A Arcury

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Diabetes educator. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diabetes symptoms and self-management behaviors in rural older adults.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara A QuandtWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)
Edward H IpWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)
Julienne K KirkWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)
Santiago SaldanaWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)
Shyh-Huei ChenWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)
Ha NguyenWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)
Ronny A BellWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)
Thomas A ArcuryWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Dr Quandt, Dr Bell, Dr Ip, Mr Saldana, Dr Chen, Dr Kirk, Dr Nguyen, Dr Arcury)

Funding

RURAL ELDERS'DIABETES SELF MANAGEMENT--ETHNIC VARIATIONR01AG017587 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI QUANDT, SARA A · 2001 to 2010
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017587NIA NIH HHS R01 AG17587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to assess the performance of a Short Diabetes Knowledge Instrument (SDKI) in a large multi-ethnic sample of older adults with diabetes and to identify possible modifications to improve its ability to document diabetes knowledge. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA sample of 593 African American, American Indian, and white female and male adults 60 years and older, with diabetes diagnosed at least 2 years prior, was recruited from 8 North Carolina counties. All completed an interview that included a 16-item questionnaire to assess diabetes knowledge. A subsample of 46 completed the questionnaire a second time at a subsequent interview. Item-response analysis was used to refine the instrument to well-performing items. The instrument consisting of the remaining items was subjected to analyses to assess validity and test-retest reliability.

resultsThree items were removed after item-response analysis. Scores for the resulting instrument were lower among minority and older participants, as well as those with lower educational attainment and income. Scores for test-retest were highly correlated.

conclusionsThe SDKI (13-item questionnaire) appears to be a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate knowledge about diabetes. Assessment in a multi-ethnic sample of older adults suggests that this instrument can be used to measure diabetes knowledge in diverse populations. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether or not this instrument can detect changes in knowledge resulting from diabetes education or other interventions.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanIndians, North AmericanWhite PeopleAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsNorth CarolinaReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24163359
PMCPMC3946961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.